2004 Kia Rio — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2004 Kia Rio passed 68.8% of its 2,733 recorded MOT tests. Against superminis of a similar age (29.1% fail rate), the 2004 Rio comes out 2.1pp worse. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and body, structure & corrosion.

69%
Pass rate
2,733
MOT tests analysed
31.3%
Fail rate
worse than
vs superminis of similar age
18.4
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (17.1%) and suspension (15.5%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are headlamp aim, joints and wheel bearings — headlamp aim alone was recorded 292 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 15.9% in the 0-30k band and 35.0% in the 120-150k band, a 19.2-point spread — more than double.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: suspension was flagged on 39.0% of tests without failing them.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2004 Rio 31.3% superminis avg 29.1% National avg 27.7%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2004 Kia Rio
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 17.1% 467
2 Suspension 15.5% 424
3 Body, structure & corrosion 12.3% 337
4 Brakes 11.6% 318
5 Visibility 8.4% 229
6 Emissions & environmental 7.0% 192
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 17.1% Suspension 15.5% Body, structure & corrosion 12.3% Brakes 11.6% Visibility 8.4% Emissions & environmental 7.0%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2004 Kia Rio
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Headlamp aim292
2Joints249
3Wheel bearings247
4Headlamp216
5Component mounting prescribed areas196
6Wipers155

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2004 Kia Rio
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 39.0% 1,065
2 Brakes 32.0% 876
3 Tyres 31.1% 850
4 Emissions & environmental 27.6% 755
5 Body, structure & corrosion 20.3% 554
6 Lighting & signalling 19.7% 539

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 15.9% 30-60k 29.7% 60-90k 33.3% 90-120k 33.6% 120-150k 35.0%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2004 Rio
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 145 15.9%
30-60k 917 29.7%
60-90k 1,117 33.3%
90-120k 432 33.6%
120-150k 117 35.0%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 17 yrs 30.1% 18 yrs 32.2% 19 yrs 29.6% 20 yrs 34.8% 21 yrs 30.1%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2004 Rio
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 883 30.1%
2022 680 32.2%
2023 503 29.6%
2024 408 34.8%
2025 259 30.1%

What to check before buying a 2004 Rio

On a 2004 Rio, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 17.1% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2004 Kia Rios pass their MOT?

68.8% of the 2,733 2004 Kia Rio MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 31.3% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2004 Kia Rio?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 17.1% of tests, followed by suspension (15.5%).

Does the 2004 Rio get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 15.9% in the 0-30k band to 35.0% in the 120-150k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 2,733 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data