2010 Kia Magentis — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 686 MOT tests, the 2010 Kia Magentis recorded a 71.6% pass rate. That is 4.4 percentage points worse than all cars of a similar age, which fail at 24.0%. Failures cluster in suspension, lighting & signalling and brakes.

72%
Pass rate
686
MOT tests analysed
28.4%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
12.6
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: suspension, recorded in 15.9% of tests against 11.5% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are suspension arm, rigid brake pipes and headlamp — suspension arm alone was recorded 50 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 21.6% in the 30-60k band and 34.2% in the 150k+ band, a 12.5-point spread.

Suspension is the most common advisory, noted on 41.7% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is worsening — 26.2% of tests failed in 2021 against 29.8% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2010 Magentis 28.4% cars avg 20.4% National avg 24.0%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2010 Kia Magentis
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Suspension 15.9% 109
2 Lighting & signalling 11.5% 79
3 Brakes 10.6% 73
4 Tyres 7.1% 49
5 Visibility 4.7% 32
6 Emissions & environmental 2.9% 20
Share of tests failing on each category Suspension 15.9% Lighting & signalling 11.5% Brakes 10.6% Tyres 7.1% Visibility 4.7% Emissions & environmental 2.9%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2010 Kia Magentis
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Suspension arm50
2Rigid brake pipes49
3Headlamp48
4Ball joint36
5Headlamp aim32
6Service brake performance26

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2010 Kia Magentis
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 41.7% 286
2 Brakes 37.5% 257
3 Tyres 30.5% 209
4 Other defects 13.3% 91
5 Emissions & environmental 7.9% 54
6 Lighting & signalling 6.9% 47

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 21.6% 60-90k 26.2% 90-120k 32.1% 120-150k 29.1% 150k+ 34.2%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2010 Magentis
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 97 21.6%
60-90k 183 26.2%
90-120k 196 32.1%
120-150k 117 29.1%
150k+ 82 34.2%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 11 yrs 26.2% 12 yrs 32.3% 13 yrs 28.5% 14 yrs 25.0% 15 yrs 29.8%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2010 Magentis
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 187 26.2%
2022 167 32.3%
2023 144 28.5%
2024 104 25.0%
2025 84 29.8%

What to check before buying a 2010 Magentis

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: suspension accounted for 15.9% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2010 Kia Magentiss pass their MOT?

71.6% of the 686 2010 Kia Magentis MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 28.4% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2010 Kia Magentis?

Suspension, recorded in 15.9% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (11.5%).

Does the 2010 Magentis get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 21.6% in the 30-60k band to 34.2% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 686 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data