2009 Jeep Compass — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 269 MOT tests, the 2009 Jeep Compass recorded a 66.9% pass rate. That is 6.9 percentage points worse than mid-size SUVs of a similar age, which fail at 26.2%. Failures cluster in suspension, lighting & signalling and brakes.

67%
Pass rate
269
MOT tests analysed
33.1%
Fail rate
worse than
vs mid-size SUVs of similar age
13.7
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Suspension dominates the failure mix at 22.7% of all tests — 7.8 points clear of lighting & signalling, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are pins and bushes, ball joint and position lamp — pins and bushes alone was recorded 43 times.

A 120-150k example is materially riskier than a 60-90k one: 45.5% versus 30.6%.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: suspension was flagged on 48.0% of tests without failing them.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2009 Compass 33.1% mid-size SUVs avg 26.2% National avg 25.2%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2009 Jeep Compass
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Suspension 22.7% 61
2 Lighting & signalling 14.9% 40
3 Brakes 11.5% 31
4 Emissions & environmental 8.6% 23
5 Steering 6.7% 18
6 Tyres 6.3% 17
Share of tests failing on each category Suspension 22.7% Lighting & signalling 14.9% Brakes 11.5% Emissions & environmental 8.6% Steering 6.7% Tyres 6.3%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2009 Jeep Compass
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Pins and bushes43
2Ball joint32
3Position lamp19
4Track rod end18
5Component mounting prescribed areas18
6Malfunction indicator lamp14

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2009 Jeep Compass
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 48.0% 129
2 Tyres 28.2% 76
3 Brakes 23.8% 64
4 Body, structure & corrosion 18.2% 49
5 Lighting & signalling 14.9% 40
6 Other defects 12.6% 34

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 60-90k 30.6% 90-120k 35.9% 120-150k 45.5%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2009 Compass
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
60-90k 98 30.6%
90-120k 103 35.9%
120-150k 33 45.5%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 12 yrs 36.1% 13 yrs 30.2% 14 yrs 36.5% 15 yrs 23.7% 16 yrs 34.9%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

By fuel type

Fail rate by fuel type — 2009 Compass
Fuel Tests Fail rate
Petrol 233 32.2%
Diesel 36 38.9%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2009 Compass
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 72 36.1%
2022 53 30.2%
2023 63 36.5%
2024 38 23.7%
2025 43 34.9%

What to check before buying a 2009 Compass

On a 2009 Compass, suspension is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 22.7% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2009 Jeep Compasss pass their MOT?

66.9% of the 269 2009 Jeep Compass MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 33.1% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2009 Jeep Compass?

Suspension, recorded in 22.7% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (14.9%).

Does the 2009 Compass get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 30.6% in the 60-90k band to 45.5% in the 120-150k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 269 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data