2008 Jaguar Xkr — MOT failures & pass rate

4,446 MOT tests on the 2008 Jaguar Xkr are in this dataset, and 81.6% of them passed. All cars of a similar age fail 26.3% of the time, so this is 7.9pp better than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in suspension, lighting & signalling and brakes.

82%
Pass rate
4,446
MOT tests analysed
18.4%
Fail rate
better than
vs cars of similar age
15
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — suspension (7.7%) and lighting & signalling (5.5%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are ball joint dust cover, track rod end and linkage ball joint dust cover — ball joint dust cover alone was recorded 412 times.

Mileage matters less than usual here: the 2008 Xkr fails 17.0% of the time in the 0-30k band and 20.0% at 150k+, a spread of only 3.0 points.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: suspension was flagged on 22.2% of tests without failing them.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2008 Xkr 18.4% cars avg 22.5% National avg 26.3%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2008 Jaguar Xkr
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Suspension 7.7% 343
2 Lighting & signalling 5.5% 245
3 Brakes 4.4% 196
4 Tyres 4.3% 193
5 Steering 3.7% 166
6 Visibility 2.5% 112
Share of tests failing on each category Suspension 7.7% Lighting & signalling 5.5% Brakes 4.4% Tyres 4.3% Steering 3.7% Visibility 2.5%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2008 Jaguar Xkr
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Ball joint dust cover412
2Track rod end279
3Linkage ball joint dust cover136
4Headlamp aim119
5Pins and bushes72
6Malfunction indicator lamp70

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2008 Jaguar Xkr
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 22.2% 987
2 Tyres 20.8% 926
3 Brakes 15.5% 691
4 Steering 5.1% 226
5 Road wheels 4.8% 213
6 Emissions & environmental 4.0% 180

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 17.0% 30-60k 17.2% 60-90k 18.8% 90-120k 19.6% 120-150k 23.0% 150k+ 20.0%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2008 Xkr
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 358 17.0%
30-60k 1,538 17.2%
60-90k 1,594 18.8%
90-120k 751 19.6%
120-150k 174 23.0%
150k+ 30 20.0%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 13 yrs 19.3% 14 yrs 17.7% 15 yrs 18.0% 16 yrs 16.8% 17 yrs 20.3%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2008 Xkr
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 940 19.3%
2022 900 17.7%
2023 894 18.0%
2024 845 16.8%
2025 867 20.3%

What to check before buying a 2008 Xkr

On a 2008 Xkr, suspension is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 7.7% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2008 Jaguar Xkrs pass their MOT?

81.6% of the 4,446 2008 Jaguar Xkr MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 18.4% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2008 Jaguar Xkr?

Suspension, recorded in 7.7% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (5.5%).

Does the 2008 Xkr get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 17.0% in the 0-30k band to 20.0% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 4,446 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data