2011 Jaguar XK — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2011 Jaguar XK passed 88.0% of its 3,222 recorded MOT tests. That is 5.9 percentage points better than coupes & convertibles of a similar age, which fail at 17.9%. Failures cluster in suspension, tyres and lighting & signalling.

88%
Pass rate
3,222
MOT tests analysed
12.0%
Fail rate
better than
vs coupes & convertibles of similar age
12
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — suspension (4.3%) and tyres (4.0%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are ball joint dust cover, headlamp aim and linkage ball joint dust cover — ball joint dust cover alone was recorded 176 times.

A 120-150k example is materially riskier than a 0-30k one: 21.6% versus 6.7%.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: tyres was flagged on 21.0% of tests without failing them.

The trend is worsening — 10.3% of tests failed in 2021 against 14.7% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2011 XK 12.0% coupes & convertibles avg 17.9% National avg 23.2%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2011 Jaguar XK
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Suspension 4.3% 138
2 Tyres 4.0% 128
3 Lighting & signalling 3.8% 122
4 Visibility 3.0% 98
5 Brakes 1.2% 40
6 Emissions & environmental 0.9% 29
Share of tests failing on each category Suspension 4.3% Tyres 4.0% Lighting & signalling 3.8% Visibility 3.0% Brakes 1.2% Emissions & environmental 0.9%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2011 Jaguar XK
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Ball joint dust cover176
2Headlamp aim72
3Linkage ball joint dust cover69
4Washers61
5Wipers51
6Tread depth41

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2011 Jaguar XK
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 21.0% 677
2 Suspension 16.0% 516
3 Brakes 11.9% 384
4 Lighting & signalling 3.5% 112
5 Visibility 3.1% 100
6 Other defects 2.9% 95

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 6.7% 30-60k 11.8% 60-90k 13.4% 90-120k 14.0% 120-150k 21.6%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2011 XK
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 418 6.7%
30-60k 1,571 11.8%
60-90k 909 13.4%
90-120k 236 14.0%
120-150k 74 21.6%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 10 yrs 10.3% 11 yrs 9.6% 12 yrs 11.7% 13 yrs 13.5% 14 yrs 14.7%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2011 XK
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 641 10.3%
2022 628 9.6%
2023 650 11.7%
2024 645 13.5%
2025 658 14.7%

What to check before buying a 2011 XK

On a 2011 XK, suspension is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 4.3% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2011 Jaguar XKs pass their MOT?

88.0% of the 3,222 2011 Jaguar XK MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 12.0% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2011 Jaguar XK?

Suspension, recorded in 4.3% of tests, followed by tyres (4.0%).

Does the 2011 XK get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 6.7% in the 0-30k band to 21.6% in the 120-150k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 3,222 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data