2019 Jaguar I-Pace — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 17,269 MOT tests, the 2019 Jaguar I-Pace recorded a 92.6% pass rate. Mid-size SUVs of a similar age fail 9.4% of the time, so this is 2.1pp better than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in tyres, lighting & signalling and steering.

93%
Pass rate
17,269
MOT tests analysed
7.4%
Fail rate
better than
vs mid-size SUVs of similar age
4.5
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Tyres dominates the failure mix at 4.4% of all tests — 3.1 points clear of lighting & signalling, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are track rod end, headlamp aim and tread depth — track rod end alone was recorded 259 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 5.9% in the 0-30k band and 11.1% in the 120-150k band, a 5.2-point spread.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: tyres was flagged on 16.6% of tests without failing them.

The trend is worsening — 4.7% of tests failed in 2021 against 8.1% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2019 I-Pace 7.4% mid-size SUVs avg 9.4% National avg 10.1%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2019 Jaguar I-Pace
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Tyres 4.4% 762
2 Lighting & signalling 1.3% 231
3 Steering 1.3% 223
4 Brakes 0.8% 143
5 Visibility 0.8% 132
6 Other defects 0.5% 80
Share of tests failing on each category Tyres 4.4% Lighting & signalling 1.3% Steering 1.3% Brakes 0.8% Visibility 0.8% Other defects 0.5%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2019 Jaguar I-Pace
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Track rod end259
2Headlamp aim235
3Tread depth142
4Registration plates124
5Wipers86
6Pedal80

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2019 Jaguar I-Pace
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 16.6% 2,862
2 Other defects 5.5% 950
3 Brakes 4.4% 767
4 Steering 2.8% 483
5 Visibility 1.6% 278
6 Suspension 0.9% 146

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 5.9% 30-60k 8.2% 60-90k 9.7% 90-120k 10.0% 120-150k 11.1%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2019 I-Pace
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 7,485 5.9%
30-60k 7,990 8.2%
60-90k 1,521 9.7%
90-120k 200 10.0%
120-150k 54 11.1%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 2 yrs 4.7% 3 yrs 6.0% 4 yrs 7.4% 5 yrs 8.1% 6 yrs 8.1%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2019 I-Pace
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 148 4.7%
2022 4,350 6.0%
2023 4,313 7.4%
2024 4,261 8.1%
2025 4,197 8.1%

What to check before buying a 2019 I-Pace

On a 2019 I-Pace, tyres is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 4.4% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2019 Jaguar I-Paces pass their MOT?

92.6% of the 17,269 2019 Jaguar I-Pace MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 7.4% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2019 Jaguar I-Pace?

Tyres, recorded in 4.4% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (1.3%).

Does the 2019 I-Pace get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 5.9% in the 0-30k band to 11.1% in the 120-150k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 17,269 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data