2012 Isuzu Tf — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 1,994 MOT tests, the 2012 Isuzu Tf recorded a 73.4% pass rate. Against all cars of a similar age (21.6% fail rate), the 2012 Tf comes out 5.0pp worse. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and brakes.

73%
Pass rate
1,994
MOT tests analysed
26.6%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
10.9
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Lighting & signalling dominates the failure mix at 19.8% of all tests — 4.8 points clear of suspension, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are rigid brake pipes, position lamp and ball joint — rigid brake pipes alone was recorded 145 times.

A 150k+ example is materially riskier than a 0-30k one: 32.3% versus 13.5%.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: suspension was flagged on 38.2% of tests without failing them.

The trend is worsening — 23.6% of tests failed in 2021 against 29.6% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2012 Tf 26.6% cars avg 18.4% National avg 21.6%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2012 Isuzu Tf
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 19.8% 394
2 Suspension 14.9% 298
3 Brakes 11.0% 219
4 Body, structure & corrosion 6.5% 130
5 Visibility 6.5% 130
6 Tyres 3.7% 73
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 19.8% Suspension 14.9% Brakes 11.0% Body, structure & corrosion 6.5% Visibility 6.5% Tyres 3.7%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2012 Isuzu Tf
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Rigid brake pipes145
2Position lamp143
3Ball joint141
4Shock absorbers121
5Rear fog lamp97
6Stop lamp89

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2012 Isuzu Tf
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 38.2% 761
2 Brakes 31.2% 622
3 Tyres 18.2% 363
4 Body, structure & corrosion 17.4% 348
5 Lighting & signalling 11.3% 225
6 Visibility 6.7% 133

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 13.5% 30-60k 18.2% 60-90k 22.2% 90-120k 28.8% 120-150k 32.9% 150k+ 32.3%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2012 Tf
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 37 13.5%
30-60k 209 18.2%
60-90k 589 22.2%
90-120k 586 28.8%
120-150k 347 32.9%
150k+ 223 32.3%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 9 yrs 23.6% 10 yrs 26.1% 11 yrs 27.0% 12 yrs 27.1% 13 yrs 29.6%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2012 Tf
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 420 23.6%
2022 425 26.1%
2023 408 27.0%
2024 376 27.1%
2025 365 29.6%

What to check before buying a 2012 Tf

On a 2012 Tf, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 19.8% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2012 Isuzu Tfs pass their MOT?

73.4% of the 1,994 2012 Isuzu Tf MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 26.6% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2012 Isuzu Tf?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 19.8% of tests, followed by suspension (14.9%).

Does the 2012 Tf get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 13.5% in the 0-30k band to 32.3% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 1,994 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data