2010 Isuzu Tf — MOT failures & pass rate

2,596 MOT tests on the 2010 Isuzu Tf are in this dataset, and 72.2% of them passed. Against all cars of a similar age (24.2% fail rate), the 2010 Tf comes out 3.6pp worse. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and brakes.

72%
Pass rate
2,596
MOT tests analysed
27.8%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
12.8
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Lighting & signalling dominates the failure mix at 22.7% of all tests — 6.2 points clear of suspension, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are position lamp, headlamp aim and rigid brake pipes — position lamp alone was recorded 252 times.

Mileage matters less than usual here: the 2010 Tf fails 28.9% of the time in the 0-30k band and 30.4% at 150k+, a spread of only 1.4 points.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: suspension was flagged on 42.7% of tests without failing them.

The trend is worsening — 26.3% of tests failed in 2021 against 29.3% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2010 Tf 27.8% cars avg 20.6% National avg 24.2%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2010 Isuzu Tf
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 22.7% 590
2 Suspension 16.6% 430
3 Brakes 11.3% 294
4 Body, structure & corrosion 7.9% 205
5 Visibility 5.6% 146
6 Tyres 3.0% 77
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 22.7% Suspension 16.6% Brakes 11.3% Body, structure & corrosion 7.9% Visibility 5.6% Tyres 3.0%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2010 Isuzu Tf
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Position lamp252
2Headlamp aim223
3Rigid brake pipes187
4Ball joint177
5Headlamp171
6Shock absorbers165

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2010 Isuzu Tf
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 42.7% 1,109
2 Brakes 34.1% 885
3 Lighting & signalling 20.3% 526
4 Tyres 18.6% 484
5 Body, structure & corrosion 18.3% 476
6 Other defects 9.8% 253

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 28.9% 30-60k 22.1% 60-90k 25.3% 90-120k 26.7% 120-150k 31.5% 150k+ 30.4%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2010 Tf
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 38 28.9%
30-60k 213 22.1%
60-90k 558 25.3%
90-120k 757 26.7%
120-150k 590 31.5%
150k+ 428 30.4%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 11 yrs 26.3% 12 yrs 26.5% 13 yrs 28.6% 14 yrs 29.2% 15 yrs 29.3%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2010 Tf
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 609 26.3%
2022 562 26.5%
2023 535 28.6%
2024 487 29.2%
2025 403 29.3%

What to check before buying a 2010 Tf

On a 2010 Tf, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 22.7% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2010 Isuzu Tfs pass their MOT?

72.2% of the 2,596 2010 Isuzu Tf MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 27.8% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2010 Isuzu Tf?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 22.7% of tests, followed by suspension (16.6%).

Does the 2010 Tf get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 28.9% in the 0-30k band to 30.4% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 2,596 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data