2016 Infiniti Q50 — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 3,724 MOT tests, the 2016 Infiniti Q50 recorded an 84.6% pass rate. Executive cars of a similar age fail 12.7% of the time, so this is 2.7pp worse than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in brakes, tyres and suspension.

85%
Pass rate
3,724
MOT tests analysed
15.4%
Fail rate
worse than
vs executive cars of similar age
6.9
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — brakes (6.2%) and tyres (6.1%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are brake pads, tread depth and linkage ball joints — brake pads alone was recorded 166 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 10.0% in the 0-30k band and 18.9% in the 150k+ band, a 8.9-point spread.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: brakes was flagged on 24.1% of tests without failing them.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2016 Q50 15.4% executive cars avg 12.7% National avg 14.4%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2016 Infiniti Q50
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Brakes 6.2% 230
2 Tyres 6.1% 228
3 Suspension 4.0% 150
4 Lighting & signalling 3.1% 116
5 Visibility 2.0% 75
6 Emissions & environmental 1.6% 61
Share of tests failing on each category Brakes 6.2% Tyres 6.1% Suspension 4.0% Lighting & signalling 3.1% Visibility 2.0% Emissions & environmental 1.6%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2016 Infiniti Q50
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Brake pads166
2Tread depth148
3Linkage ball joints84
4Wipers77
5Ball joint65
6Malfunction indicator lamp54

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2016 Infiniti Q50
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 24.1% 898
2 Tyres 23.9% 889
3 Suspension 20.4% 759
4 Other defects 6.3% 234
5 Visibility 3.2% 119
6 Lighting & signalling 2.5% 95

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 10.0% 30-60k 13.3% 60-90k 16.8% 90-120k 18.5% 120-150k 20.6% 150k+ 18.9%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2016 Q50
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 249 10.0%
30-60k 1,444 13.3%
60-90k 1,339 16.8%
90-120k 482 18.5%
120-150k 136 20.6%
150k+ 74 18.9%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 5 yrs 15.6% 6 yrs 14.9% 7 yrs 14.3% 8 yrs 15.4% 9 yrs 16.7%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

By fuel type

Fail rate by fuel type — 2016 Q50
Fuel Tests Fail rate
Diesel 3,284 16.1%
Petrol 267 9.4%
Hybrid 173 11.6%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2016 Q50
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 777 15.6%
2022 769 14.9%
2023 748 14.3%
2024 725 15.4%
2025 705 16.7%

What to check before buying a 2016 Q50

On a 2016 Q50, brakes is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 6.2% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2016 Infiniti Q50s pass their MOT?

84.6% of the 3,724 2016 Infiniti Q50 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 15.4% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2016 Infiniti Q50?

Brakes, recorded in 6.2% of tests, followed by tyres (6.1%).

Does the 2016 Q50 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 10.0% in the 0-30k band to 18.9% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 3,724 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data