2016 Hyundai I800 — MOT failures & pass rate

6,609 MOT tests on the 2016 Hyundai I800 are in this dataset, and 78.2% of them passed. That is 7.2 percentage points worse than all cars of a similar age, which fail at 14.5%. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, brakes and tyres.

78%
Pass rate
6,609
MOT tests analysed
21.8%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
7
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: lighting & signalling, recorded in 19.2% of tests against 13.0% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are headlamp aim, position lamp and rbt (sp) — headlamp aim alone was recorded 670 times.

A 150k+ example is materially riskier than a 0-30k one: 19.9% versus 15.4%.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 24.8% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is worsening — 20.0% of tests failed in 2021 against 23.7% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2016 I800 21.8% cars avg 13.3% National avg 14.5%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2016 Hyundai I800
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 19.2% 1,266
2 Brakes 13.0% 857
3 Tyres 5.4% 354
4 Emissions & environmental 5.1% 338
5 Visibility 4.0% 267
6 Suspension 1.6% 107
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 19.2% Brakes 13.0% Tyres 5.4% Emissions & environmental 5.1% Visibility 4.0% Suspension 1.6%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2016 Hyundai I800
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Headlamp aim670
2Position lamp495
3Rbt (sp)416
4Headlamp316
5Malfunction indicator lamp303
6Parking brake performance275

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2016 Hyundai I800
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 24.8% 1,642
2 Tyres 22.3% 1,471
3 Other defects 10.9% 722
4 Lighting & signalling 10.5% 695
5 Suspension 4.3% 285
6 Visibility 3.5% 233

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 15.4% 30-60k 20.4% 60-90k 22.8% 90-120k 24.4% 120-150k 21.0% 150k+ 19.9%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2016 I800
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 247 15.4%
30-60k 2,117 20.4%
60-90k 2,509 22.8%
90-120k 1,003 24.4%
120-150k 396 21.0%
150k+ 337 19.9%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 5 yrs 20.0% 6 yrs 21.0% 7 yrs 21.3% 8 yrs 22.6% 9 yrs 23.7%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2016 I800
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 1,288 20.0%
2022 1,326 21.0%
2023 1,340 21.3%
2024 1,347 22.6%
2025 1,308 23.7%

What to check before buying a 2016 I800

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 19.2% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2016 Hyundai I800s pass their MOT?

78.2% of the 6,609 2016 Hyundai I800 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 21.8% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2016 Hyundai I800?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 19.2% of tests, followed by brakes (13.0%).

Does the 2016 I800 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 15.4% in the 0-30k band to 19.9% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 6,609 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data