2008 Hyundai i20 — MOT failures & pass rate

612 MOT tests on the 2008 Hyundai i20 are in this dataset, and 79.7% of them passed. Superminis of a similar age fail 27.0% of the time, so this is 6.8pp better than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, visibility and suspension.

80%
Pass rate
612
MOT tests analysed
20.3%
Fail rate
better than
vs superminis of similar age
14.9
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Lighting & signalling dominates the failure mix at 14.4% of all tests — 6.7 points clear of visibility, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are position lamp, washers and stop lamp — position lamp alone was recorded 48 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 13.7% in the 30-60k band and 22.2% in the 120-150k band, a 8.5-point spread.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: brakes was flagged on 33.0% of tests without failing them.

The trend is worsening — 15.9% of tests failed in 2021 against 21.9% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2008 i20 20.3% superminis avg 27.0% National avg 26.2%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2008 Hyundai i20
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 14.4% 88
2 Visibility 7.7% 47
3 Suspension 7.5% 46
4 Brakes 7.2% 44
5 Tyres 3.6% 22
6 Seat belts & restraints 2.6% 16
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 14.4% Visibility 7.7% Suspension 7.5% Brakes 7.2% Tyres 3.6% Seat belts & restraints 2.6%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2008 Hyundai i20
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Position lamp48
2Washers36
3Stop lamp30
4Wipers27
5Headlamp aim26
6Service brake performance19

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2008 Hyundai i20
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 33.0% 202
2 Tyres 29.6% 181
3 Suspension 26.5% 162
4 Lighting & signalling 20.6% 126
5 Other defects 12.8% 78
6 Steering 5.9% 36

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 13.7% 60-90k 23.2% 90-120k 21.5% 120-150k 22.2%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2008 i20
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 117 13.7%
60-90k 241 23.2%
90-120k 195 21.5%
120-150k 36 22.2%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 13 yrs 15.9% 14 yrs 16.2% 15 yrs 26.1% 16 yrs 21.6% 17 yrs 21.9%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2008 i20
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 132 15.9%
2022 130 16.2%
2023 138 26.1%
2024 116 21.6%
2025 96 21.9%

What to check before buying a 2008 i20

On a 2008 i20, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 14.4% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2008 Hyundai i20s pass their MOT?

79.7% of the 612 2008 Hyundai i20 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 20.3% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2008 Hyundai i20?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 14.4% of tests, followed by visibility (7.7%).

Does the 2008 i20 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 13.7% in the 30-60k band to 22.2% in the 120-150k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 612 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data