2009 Honda S2000 — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2009 Honda S2000 passed 91.4% of its 1,866 recorded MOT tests. That is 11.7 percentage points better than coupes & convertibles of a similar age, which fail at 20.3%. Failures cluster in brakes, visibility and suspension.

91%
Pass rate
1,866
MOT tests analysed
8.6%
Fail rate
better than
vs coupes & convertibles of similar age
14
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — brakes (3.0%) and visibility (2.7%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are service brake performance, wipers and catalyst emissions — service brake performance alone was recorded 42 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 4.7% in the 0-30k band and 18.6% in the 90-120k band, a 13.9-point spread — more than double.

Tyres is the most common advisory, noted on 14.8% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 10.8% in 2021 to 7.8% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2009 S2000 8.6% coupes & convertibles avg 20.3% National avg 25.5%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2009 Honda S2000
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Brakes 3.0% 56
2 Visibility 2.7% 50
3 Suspension 2.4% 45
4 Lighting & signalling 1.7% 32
5 Tyres 1.6% 29
6 Emissions & environmental 1.1% 20
Share of tests failing on each category Brakes 3.0% Visibility 2.7% Suspension 2.4% Lighting & signalling 1.7% Tyres 1.6% Emissions & environmental 1.1%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2009 Honda S2000
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Service brake performance42
2Wipers31
3Catalyst emissions29
4Washers27
5Headlamp aim18
6Linkage15

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2009 Honda S2000
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 14.8% 276
2 Brakes 12.3% 229
3 Suspension 8.9% 167
4 Visibility 3.8% 70
5 Other defects 2.5% 46
6 Body, structure & corrosion 2.1% 39

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 4.7% 30-60k 7.4% 60-90k 10.7% 90-120k 18.6%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2009 S2000
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 466 4.7%
30-60k 842 7.4%
60-90k 391 10.7%
90-120k 118 18.6%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 12 yrs 10.8% 13 yrs 7.6% 14 yrs 9.8% 15 yrs 7.0% 16 yrs 7.8%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2009 S2000
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 389 10.8%
2022 368 7.6%
2023 389 9.8%
2024 359 7.0%
2025 361 7.8%

What to check before buying a 2009 S2000

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: brakes accounted for 3.0% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2009 Honda S2000s pass their MOT?

91.4% of the 1,866 2009 Honda S2000 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 8.6% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2009 Honda S2000?

Brakes, recorded in 3.0% of tests, followed by visibility (2.7%).

Does the 2009 S2000 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 4.7% in the 0-30k band to 18.6% in the 90-120k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 1,866 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data