2008 Honda Legend — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 606 MOT tests, the 2008 Honda Legend recorded an 81.5% pass rate. That is 7.8 percentage points better than all cars of a similar age, which fail at 26.3%. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and visibility.

82%
Pass rate
606
MOT tests analysed
18.5%
Fail rate
better than
vs cars of similar age
14.9
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (8.9%) and suspension (7.4%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are position lamp, ball joint and wipers — position lamp alone was recorded 27 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 8.2% of 30-60k cars fail, rising to 23.3% once past 150k — 2.8× the risk.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: brakes was flagged on 21.1% of tests without failing them.

The trend is worsening — 14.3% of tests failed in 2021 against 22.4% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2008 Legend 18.5% cars avg 22.4% National avg 26.3%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2008 Honda Legend
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 8.9% 54
2 Suspension 7.4% 45
3 Visibility 5.1% 31
4 Brakes 3.5% 21
5 Tyres 3.0% 18
6 Emissions & environmental 1.2% 7
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 8.9% Suspension 7.4% Visibility 5.1% Brakes 3.5% Tyres 3.0% Emissions & environmental 1.2%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2008 Honda Legend
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Position lamp27
2Ball joint23
3Wipers22
4Headlamp aim21
5Linkage20
6Headlamp17

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2008 Honda Legend
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 21.1% 128
2 Suspension 20.6% 125
3 Tyres 20.1% 122
4 Lighting & signalling 12.9% 78
5 Visibility 9.7% 59
6 Other defects 8.3% 50

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 8.2% 60-90k 18.4% 90-120k 18.8% 120-150k 26.8% 150k+ 23.3%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2008 Legend
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 73 8.2%
60-90k 190 18.4%
90-120k 192 18.8%
120-150k 97 26.8%
150k+ 30 23.3%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 13 yrs 14.3% 14 yrs 17.5% 15 yrs 17.1% 16 yrs 21.9% 17 yrs 22.4%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2008 Legend
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 133 14.3%
2022 120 17.5%
2023 123 17.1%
2024 123 21.9%
2025 107 22.4%

What to check before buying a 2008 Legend

On a 2008 Legend, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 8.9% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2008 Honda Legends pass their MOT?

81.5% of the 606 2008 Honda Legend MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 18.5% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2008 Honda Legend?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 8.9% of tests, followed by suspension (7.4%).

Does the 2008 Legend get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 8.2% in the 30-60k band to 23.3% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 606 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data