2000 Honda CR-V — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2000 Honda CR-V passed 69.2% of its 6,438 recorded MOT tests. Mid-size SUVs of a similar age fail 28.2% of the time, so this is 2.6pp worse than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in suspension, lighting & signalling and emissions & environmental.

69%
Pass rate
6,438
MOT tests analysed
30.8%
Fail rate
worse than
vs mid-size SUVs of similar age
22.5
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — suspension (18.8%) and lighting & signalling (16.3%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are catalyst emissions, component mounting prescribed areas and ball joint — catalyst emissions alone was recorded 740 times.

A 150k+ example is materially riskier than a 30-60k one: 37.0% versus 16.1%.

Suspension is the most common advisory, noted on 49.2% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2000 CR-V 30.8% mid-size SUVs avg 28.2% National avg 26.8%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2000 Honda CR-V
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Suspension 18.8% 1,213
2 Lighting & signalling 16.3% 1,046
3 Emissions & environmental 10.6% 680
4 Body, structure & corrosion 7.7% 494
5 Visibility 5.8% 376
6 Brakes 5.6% 359
Share of tests failing on each category Suspension 18.8% Lighting & signalling 16.3% Emissions & environmental 10.6% Body, structure & corrosion 7.7% Visibility 5.8% Brakes 5.6%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2000 Honda CR-V
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Catalyst emissions740
2Component mounting prescribed areas689
3Ball joint577
4Headlamp aim454
5Pins and bushes404
6Stop lamp393

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2000 Honda CR-V
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 49.2% 3,170
2 Tyres 26.7% 1,719
3 Brakes 24.2% 1,559
4 Lighting & signalling 19.8% 1,273
5 Emissions & environmental 17.4% 1,118
6 Other defects 16.6% 1,069

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 16.1% 60-90k 24.1% 90-120k 29.9% 120-150k 32.0% 150k+ 37.0%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2000 CR-V
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 186 16.1%
60-90k 964 24.1%
90-120k 1,999 29.9%
120-150k 1,839 32.0%
150k+ 1,423 37.0%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 21 yrs 31.1% 22 yrs 29.5% 23 yrs 30.5% 24 yrs 32.1% 25 yrs 31.6%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2000 CR-V
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 2,030 31.1%
2022 1,558 29.5%
2023 1,207 30.5%
2024 913 32.1%
2025 730 31.6%

What to check before buying a 2000 CR-V

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: suspension accounted for 18.8% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2000 Honda CR-Vs pass their MOT?

69.2% of the 6,438 2000 Honda CR-V MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 30.8% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2000 Honda CR-V?

Suspension, recorded in 18.8% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (16.3%).

Does the 2000 CR-V get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 16.1% in the 30-60k band to 37.0% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 6,438 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data