2000 Honda Accord — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2000 Honda Accord passed 70.3% of its 6,336 recorded MOT tests. That is 1.8 percentage points worse than large family cars of a similar age, which fail at 27.9%. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and emissions & environmental.

70%
Pass rate
6,336
MOT tests analysed
29.7%
Fail rate
worse than
vs large family cars of similar age
22.5
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: lighting & signalling, recorded in 17.2% of tests against 12.3% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are catalyst emissions, headlamp aim and headlamp — catalyst emissions alone was recorded 833 times.

A 150k+ example is materially riskier than a 0-30k one: 32.9% versus 4.7%.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 37.2% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2000 Accord 29.7% large family cars avg 27.9% National avg 26.8%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2000 Honda Accord
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 17.2% 1,088
2 Suspension 12.3% 778
3 Emissions & environmental 11.7% 744
4 Brakes 11.5% 726
5 Body, structure & corrosion 8.9% 564
6 Visibility 6.4% 403
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 17.2% Suspension 12.3% Emissions & environmental 11.7% Brakes 11.5% Body, structure & corrosion 8.9% Visibility 6.4%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2000 Honda Accord
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Catalyst emissions833
2Headlamp aim630
3Headlamp491
4Component mounting prescribed areas435
5Position lamp326
6Steering rack295

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2000 Honda Accord
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 37.2% 2,359
2 Suspension 32.2% 2,039
3 Tyres 26.3% 1,664
4 Lighting & signalling 19.8% 1,255
5 Other defects 15.9% 1,009
6 Body, structure & corrosion 14.7% 934

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 4.7% 30-60k 23.1% 60-90k 26.7% 90-120k 30.8% 120-150k 34.2% 150k+ 32.9%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2000 Accord
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 43 4.7%
30-60k 602 23.1%
60-90k 1,782 26.7%
90-120k 1,935 30.8%
120-150k 1,285 34.2%
150k+ 685 32.9%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 21 yrs 29.7% 22 yrs 28.8% 23 yrs 30.9% 24 yrs 30.5% 25 yrs 28.4%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2000 Accord
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 1,948 29.7%
2022 1,518 28.8%
2023 1,229 30.9%
2024 911 30.5%
2025 730 28.4%

What to check before buying a 2000 Accord

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 17.2% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2000 Honda Accords pass their MOT?

70.3% of the 6,336 2000 Honda Accord MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 29.7% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2000 Honda Accord?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 17.2% of tests, followed by suspension (12.3%).

Does the 2000 Accord get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 4.7% in the 0-30k band to 32.9% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 6,336 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data