2000 Ford Mustang — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2000 Ford Mustang passed 81.7% of its 273 recorded MOT tests. Coupes & convertibles of a similar age fail 22.3% of the time, so this is 4.0pp better than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, brakes and suspension.

82%
Pass rate
273
MOT tests analysed
18.3%
Fail rate
better than
vs coupes & convertibles of similar age
23.2
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (12.1%) and brakes (11.0%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are headlamp aim, rbt (sp) and service brake performance — headlamp aim alone was recorded 24 times.

Mileage matters less than usual here: the 2000 Mustang fails 14.1% of the time in the 30-60k band and 12.5% at 90-120k, a spread of only 1.6 points.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 26.0% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2000 Mustang 18.3% coupes & convertibles avg 22.3% National avg 26.5%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2000 Ford Mustang
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 12.1% 33
2 Brakes 11.0% 30
3 Suspension 5.5% 15
4 Visibility 2.6% 7
5 Body, structure & corrosion 2.2% 6
6 Tyres 1.8% 5
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 12.1% Brakes 11.0% Suspension 5.5% Visibility 2.6% Body, structure & corrosion 2.2% Tyres 1.8%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2000 Ford Mustang
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Headlamp aim24
2Rbt (sp)21
3Service brake performance12
4Ball joint dust cover11
5Individual direction indicators10
6Headlamp8

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2000 Ford Mustang
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 26.0% 71
2 Suspension 21.6% 59
3 Tyres 14.6% 40
4 Lighting & signalling 12.8% 35
5 Steering 8.8% 24
6 Other defects 8.1% 22

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 14.1% 60-90k 19.6% 90-120k 12.5%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2000 Mustang
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 71 14.1%
60-90k 97 19.6%
90-120k 32 12.5%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 21 yrs 18.2% 22 yrs 10.3% 23 yrs 20.9% 24 yrs 21.9% 25 yrs 19.6%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2000 Mustang
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 33 18.2%
2022 58 10.3%
2023 67 20.9%
2024 64 21.9%
2025 51 19.6%

What to check before buying a 2000 Mustang

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 12.1% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2000 Ford Mustangs pass their MOT?

81.7% of the 273 2000 Ford Mustang MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 18.3% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2000 Ford Mustang?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 12.1% of tests, followed by brakes (11.0%).

Does the 2000 Mustang get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 14.1% in the 30-60k band to 12.5% in the 90-120k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 273 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data