2016 Ford Ka — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 48,756 MOT tests, the 2016 Ford Ka recorded an 84.3% pass rate. Against city cars of a similar age (13.7% fail rate), the 2016 Ka comes out 2.0pp worse. Failures cluster in suspension, lighting & signalling and tyres.

84%
Pass rate
48,756
MOT tests analysed
15.7%
Fail rate
worse than
vs city cars of similar age
7
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — suspension (7.6%) and lighting & signalling (5.5%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are coil spring, shock absorbers and wipers — coil spring alone was recorded 2,090 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 10.3% in the 0-30k band and 20.8% in the 120-150k band, a 10.5-point spread — more than double.

Tyres is the most common advisory, noted on 23.9% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is worsening — 12.2% of tests failed in 2021 against 19.0% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2016 Ka 15.7% city cars avg 13.7% National avg 14.6%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2016 Ford Ka
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Suspension 7.6% 3,687
2 Lighting & signalling 5.5% 2,659
3 Tyres 4.4% 2,156
4 Visibility 3.8% 1,834
5 Brakes 3.7% 1,791
6 Emissions & environmental 1.4% 676
Share of tests failing on each category Suspension 7.6% Lighting & signalling 5.5% Tyres 4.4% Visibility 3.8% Brakes 3.7% Emissions & environmental 1.4%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2016 Ford Ka
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Coil spring2,090
2Shock absorbers2,049
3Wipers1,347
4Tread depth1,076
5Headlamp aim1,048
6Brake pads993

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2016 Ford Ka
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 23.9% 11,661
2 Suspension 20.3% 9,916
3 Brakes 14.8% 7,215
4 Other defects 5.9% 2,887
5 Body, structure & corrosion 4.6% 2,235
6 Road wheels 3.1% 1,500

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 10.3% 30-60k 18.2% 60-90k 23.5% 90-120k 25.7% 120-150k 20.8%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2016 Ka
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 19,715 10.3%
30-60k 22,736 18.2%
60-90k 5,531 23.5%
90-120k 655 25.7%
120-150k 77 20.8%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 5 yrs 12.2% 6 yrs 14.0% 7 yrs 15.5% 8 yrs 17.7% 9 yrs 19.0%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2016 Ka
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 9,443 12.2%
2022 9,641 14.0%
2023 9,785 15.5%
2024 9,856 17.7%
2025 10,031 19.0%

What to check before buying a 2016 Ka

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: suspension accounted for 7.6% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2016 Ford Kas pass their MOT?

84.3% of the 48,756 2016 Ford Ka MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 15.7% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2016 Ford Ka?

Suspension, recorded in 7.6% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (5.5%).

Does the 2016 Ka get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 10.3% in the 0-30k band to 20.8% in the 120-150k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 48,756 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data