2001 Ford Ka — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 4,499 MOT tests, the 2001 Ford Ka recorded a 66.5% pass rate. City cars of a similar age fail 28.8% of the time, so this is 4.7pp worse than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in suspension, lighting & signalling and brakes.

66%
Pass rate
4,499
MOT tests analysed
33.5%
Fail rate
worse than
vs city cars of similar age
21.3
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: suspension, recorded in 24.3% of tests against 13.7% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are component mounting prescribed areas, pins and bushes and prescribed areas — component mounting prescribed areas alone was recorded 1,145 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 27.1% in the 0-30k band and 39.8% in the 90-120k band, a 12.7-point spread.

Suspension is the most common advisory, noted on 45.0% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2001 Ka 33.5% city cars avg 28.8% National avg 27.3%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2001 Ford Ka
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Suspension 24.3% 1,092
2 Lighting & signalling 13.7% 616
3 Brakes 8.5% 381
4 Body, structure & corrosion 8.1% 364
5 Visibility 7.5% 336
6 Seat belts & restraints 7.2% 323
Share of tests failing on each category Suspension 24.3% Lighting & signalling 13.7% Brakes 8.5% Body, structure & corrosion 8.1% Visibility 7.5% Seat belts & restraints 7.2%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2001 Ford Ka
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Component mounting prescribed areas1,145
2Pins and bushes499
3Prescribed areas456
4Integral vehicle structure condition338
5Chassis condition295
6Headlamp aim291

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2001 Ford Ka
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 45.0% 2,023
2 Brakes 28.8% 1,298
3 Tyres 25.5% 1,148
4 Body, structure & corrosion 14.5% 653
5 Emissions & environmental 13.9% 624
6 Other defects 12.1% 544

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 27.1% 30-60k 32.4% 60-90k 38.5% 90-120k 39.8%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2001 Ka
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 789 27.1%
30-60k 2,225 32.4%
60-90k 1,263 38.5%
90-120k 216 39.8%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 20 yrs 33.8% 21 yrs 32.9% 22 yrs 34.5% 23 yrs 33.0% 24 yrs 32.8%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2001 Ka
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 1,584 33.8%
2022 1,130 32.9%
2023 820 34.5%
2024 563 33.0%
2025 402 32.8%

What to check before buying a 2001 Ka

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: suspension accounted for 24.3% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2001 Ford Kas pass their MOT?

66.5% of the 4,499 2001 Ford Ka MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 33.5% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2001 Ford Ka?

Suspension, recorded in 24.3% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (13.7%).

Does the 2001 Ka get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 27.1% in the 0-30k band to 39.8% in the 90-120k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 4,499 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data