1998 Ford Ka — MOT failures & pass rate

The 1998 Ford Ka passed 69.8% of its 816 recorded MOT tests. Against city cars of a similar age (27.0% fail rate), the 1998 Ka comes out 3.2pp worse. Failures cluster in suspension, brakes and lighting & signalling.

70%
Pass rate
816
MOT tests analysed
30.1%
Fail rate
worse than
vs city cars of similar age
24.4
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — suspension (16.1%) and brakes (13.4%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are component mounting prescribed areas, prescribed areas and wipers — component mounting prescribed areas alone was recorded 139 times.

A 90-120k example is materially riskier than a 0-30k one: 41.3% versus 23.1%.

Suspension is the most common advisory, noted on 43.4% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 33.1% in 2021 to 27.6% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 1998 Ka 30.1% city cars avg 27.0% National avg 25.8%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 1998 Ford Ka
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Suspension 16.1% 131
2 Brakes 13.4% 109
3 Lighting & signalling 13.1% 107
4 Visibility 8.5% 69
5 Body, structure & corrosion 8.3% 68
6 Seat belts & restraints 6.3% 51
Share of tests failing on each category Suspension 16.1% Brakes 13.4% Lighting & signalling 13.1% Visibility 8.5% Body, structure & corrosion 8.3% Seat belts & restraints 6.3%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 1998 Ford Ka
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Component mounting prescribed areas139
2Prescribed areas61
3Wipers57
4Headlamp aim55
5Headlamp54
6Service brake performance52

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 1998 Ford Ka
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 43.4% 354
2 Brakes 31.1% 254
3 Tyres 26.7% 218
4 Body, structure & corrosion 17.9% 146
5 Other defects 15.1% 123
6 Emissions & environmental 13.0% 106

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 23.1% 30-60k 31.0% 60-90k 33.0% 90-120k 41.3%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 1998 Ka
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 173 23.1%
30-60k 393 31.0%
60-90k 197 33.0%
90-120k 46 41.3%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 23 yrs 33.1% 24 yrs 30.1% 25 yrs 26.4%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 1998 Ka
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 284 33.1%
2022 206 30.1%
2023 144 26.4%
2024 106 29.3%
2025 76 27.6%

What to check before buying a 1998 Ka

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: suspension accounted for 16.1% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 1998 Ford Kas pass their MOT?

69.8% of the 816 1998 Ford Ka MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 30.1% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 1998 Ford Ka?

Suspension, recorded in 16.1% of tests, followed by brakes (13.4%).

Does the 1998 Ka get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 23.1% in the 0-30k band to 41.3% in the 90-120k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 816 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data