2008 Ford Freda — MOT failures & pass rate
Across 401 MOT tests, the 2008 Ford Freda recorded a 64.3% pass rate. That is 9.6 percentage points worse than all cars of a similar age, which fail at 26.0%. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and body, structure & corrosion.
What the MOT record shows
No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (22.4%) and suspension (21.2%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.
At component level the recurring items are component mounting prescribed areas, integral vehicle structure condition and headlamp — component mounting prescribed areas alone was recorded 135 times.
A 150k+ example is materially riskier than a 60-90k one: 37.1% versus 26.7%.
Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: suspension was flagged on 31.4% of tests without failing them.
The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 35.6% in 2021 to 30.4% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.
How it compares
Top failure categories
| # | Category | % of tests affected | Tests |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lighting & signalling | 22.4% | 90 |
| 2 | Suspension | 21.2% | 85 |
| 3 | Body, structure & corrosion | 14.2% | 57 |
| 4 | Brakes | 11.2% | 45 |
| 5 | Visibility | 8.7% | 35 |
| 6 | Emissions & environmental | 6.7% | 27 |
Most common specific failures
The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.
| # | Failure item | Times recorded |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Component mounting prescribed areas | 135 |
| 2 | Integral vehicle structure condition | 52 |
| 3 | Headlamp | 42 |
| 4 | Chassis condition | 36 |
| 5 | Rear fog lamp | 34 |
| 6 | Exhaust system | 23 |
Top advisory categories
Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.
| # | Category | % of tests with advisory | Tests |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Suspension | 31.4% | 126 |
| 2 | Brakes | 28.9% | 116 |
| 3 | Emissions & environmental | 24.2% | 97 |
| 4 | Body, structure & corrosion | 18.4% | 74 |
| 5 | Lighting & signalling | 17.0% | 68 |
| 6 | Tyres | 15.2% | 61 |
Failure rate by mileage
Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.
| Mileage band | Tests | Fail rate |
|---|---|---|
| 60-90k | 30 | 26.7% |
| 90-120k | 61 | 31.1% |
| 120-150k | 88 | 38.6% |
| 150k+ | 221 | 37.1% |
Failure rate by age
By fuel type
| Fuel | Tests | Fail rate |
|---|---|---|
| Diesel | 327 | 34.6% |
| Petrol | 74 | 40.5% |
Trend over time
| Dataset year | Tests | Fail rate |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 104 | 35.6% |
| 2022 | 102 | 38.2% |
| 2023 | 97 | 34.0% |
| 2024 | 52 | 38.5% |
| 2025 | 46 | 30.4% |
What to check before buying a 2008 Freda
On a 2008 Freda, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 22.4% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.
- Lighting & signalling (22.4% of tests): Often a cheap bulb, but persistent issues can mean wiring or corrosion in the units. Typical repair: £10–£150.
- Suspension (21.2% of tests): Worn drop links, bushes, springs or shocks — listen for knocks over bumps and check for uneven tyre wear. Typical repair: £150–£450 per corner.
- Body, structure & corrosion (14.2% of tests): The one to take seriously on older cars — corrosion to structural areas can be costly and is an MOT failure. Typical repair: £200–£1,500+.
Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.
Frequently asked questions
How many 2008 Ford Fredas pass their MOT?
64.3% of the 401 2008 Ford Freda MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 35.7% fail rate.
What is the most common MOT failure on a 2008 Ford Freda?
Lighting & signalling, recorded in 22.4% of tests, followed by suspension (21.2%).
Does the 2008 Freda get worse with mileage?
Its MOT fail rate rises from 26.7% in the 60-90k band to 37.1% in the 150k+ band.
Methodology & source. Based on 401 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.