1995 Ford Freda — MOT failures & pass rate

The 1995 Ford Freda passed 67.8% of its 267 recorded MOT tests. All cars of a similar age fail 24.1% of the time, so this is 8.2pp worse than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in suspension, lighting & signalling and body, structure & corrosion.

68%
Pass rate
267
MOT tests analysed
32.2%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
28.5
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Suspension dominates the failure mix at 18.7% of all tests — 3.4 points clear of lighting & signalling, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are component mounting prescribed areas, integral vehicle structure condition and chassis condition — component mounting prescribed areas alone was recorded 61 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 29.8% of 90-120k cars fail, rising to 33.9% once past 150k.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: suspension was flagged on 43.5% of tests without failing them.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 34.2% in 2021 to 32.5% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 1995 Freda 32.2% cars avg 22.6% National avg 24.1%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 1995 Ford Freda
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Suspension 18.7% 50
2 Lighting & signalling 15.4% 41
3 Body, structure & corrosion 12.4% 33
4 Brakes 9.4% 25
5 Visibility 7.5% 20
6 Steering 3.8% 10
Share of tests failing on each category Suspension 18.7% Lighting & signalling 15.4% Body, structure & corrosion 12.4% Brakes 9.4% Visibility 7.5% Steering 3.8%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 1995 Ford Freda
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Component mounting prescribed areas61
2Integral vehicle structure condition28
3Chassis condition25
4Rear fog lamp25
5Wipers19
6Headlamp aim15

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 1995 Ford Freda
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 43.5% 116
2 Brakes 34.8% 93
3 Body, structure & corrosion 28.8% 77
4 Emissions & environmental 27.0% 72
5 Lighting & signalling 17.2% 46
6 Tyres 15.7% 42

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 90-120k 29.8% 120-150k 32.8% 150k+ 33.9%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 1995 Freda
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
90-120k 67 29.8%
120-150k 67 32.8%
150k+ 127 33.9%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 1995 Freda
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 38 34.2%
2022 33 36.4%
2023 33 36.4%
2024 86 27.9%
2025 77 32.5%

What to check before buying a 1995 Freda

On a 1995 Freda, suspension is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 18.7% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 1995 Ford Fredas pass their MOT?

67.8% of the 267 1995 Ford Freda MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 32.2% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 1995 Ford Freda?

Suspension, recorded in 18.7% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (15.4%).

Does the 1995 Freda get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 29.8% in the 90-120k band to 33.9% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 267 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data