2003 Ford F150 — MOT failures & pass rate

341 MOT tests on the 2003 Ford F150 are in this dataset, and 85.9% of them passed. Against all cars of a similar age (27.6% fail rate), the 2003 F150 comes out 13.5pp better. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, brakes and suspension.

86%
Pass rate
341
MOT tests analysed
14.1%
Fail rate
better than
vs cars of similar age
20
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (8.8%) and brakes (7.3%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are rear fog lamp, rbt (sp) and ball joint — rear fog lamp alone was recorded 14 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 6.5% in the 30-60k band and 21.6% in the 150k+ band, a 15.2-point spread — more than double.

Suspension is the most common advisory, noted on 25.8% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is worsening — 13.0% of tests failed in 2021 against 15.7% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2003 F150 14.1% cars avg 24.3% National avg 27.6%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2003 Ford F150
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 8.8% 30
2 Brakes 7.3% 25
3 Suspension 4.1% 14
4 Body, structure & corrosion 3.2% 11
5 Tyres 1.8% 6
6 Steering 1.5% 5
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 8.8% Brakes 7.3% Suspension 4.1% Body, structure & corrosion 3.2% Tyres 1.8% Steering 1.5%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2003 Ford F150
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Rear fog lamp14
2Rbt (sp)14
3Ball joint9
4Wheel bearings6
5Position lamp6
6Ball joint dust cover6

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2003 Ford F150
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 25.8% 88
2 Brakes 16.1% 55
3 Tyres 8.8% 30
4 Body, structure & corrosion 7.0% 24
5 Emissions & environmental 6.5% 22
6 Steering 5.9% 20

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 6.5% 60-90k 7.6% 90-120k 19.5% 120-150k 23.7% 150k+ 21.6%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2003 F150
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 62 6.5%
60-90k 105 7.6%
90-120k 82 19.5%
120-150k 38 23.7%
150k+ 37 21.6%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 18 yrs 13.0% 19 yrs 14.5% 20 yrs 11.8% 21 yrs 15.4% 22 yrs 15.7%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2003 F150
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 69 13.0%
2022 69 14.5%
2023 68 11.8%
2024 65 15.4%
2025 70 15.7%

What to check before buying a 2003 F150

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 8.8% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2003 Ford F150s pass their MOT?

85.9% of the 341 2003 Ford F150 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 14.1% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2003 Ford F150?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 8.8% of tests, followed by brakes (7.3%).

Does the 2003 F150 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 6.5% in the 30-60k band to 21.6% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 341 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data