1997 Ford Explorer — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 290 MOT tests, the 1997 Ford Explorer recorded a 78.6% pass rate. That is 3.8 percentage points better than all cars of a similar age, which fail at 25.2%. Failures cluster in suspension, lighting & signalling and brakes.

79%
Pass rate
290
MOT tests analysed
21.4%
Fail rate
better than
vs cars of similar age
25.6
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — suspension (11.0%) and lighting & signalling (10.7%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are ball joint dust cover, catalyst emissions and rear fog lamp — ball joint dust cover alone was recorded 14 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 12.2% of 60-90k cars fail, rising to 23.3% once past 150k.

Suspension is the most common advisory, noted on 45.5% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 1997 Explorer 21.4% cars avg 22.9% National avg 25.2%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 1997 Ford Explorer
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Suspension 11.0% 32
2 Lighting & signalling 10.7% 31
3 Brakes 9.0% 26
4 Body, structure & corrosion 8.3% 24
5 Emissions & environmental 5.2% 15
6 Seat belts & restraints 4.1% 12
Share of tests failing on each category Suspension 11.0% Lighting & signalling 10.7% Brakes 9.0% Body, structure & corrosion 8.3% Emissions & environmental 5.2% Seat belts & restraints 4.1%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 1997 Ford Explorer
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Ball joint dust cover14
2Catalyst emissions14
3Rear fog lamp13
4Exhaust system12
5Integral vehicle structure condition11
6Linkage pins and bushes11

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 1997 Ford Explorer
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 45.5% 132
2 Brakes 29.3% 85
3 Body, structure & corrosion 26.9% 78
4 Tyres 18.6% 54
5 Emissions & environmental 16.2% 47
6 Other defects 15.5% 45

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 60-90k 12.2% 90-120k 27.1% 120-150k 21.3% 150k+ 23.3%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 1997 Explorer
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
60-90k 41 12.2%
90-120k 96 27.1%
120-150k 80 21.3%
150k+ 43 23.3%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 24 yrs 21.2% 25 yrs 18.1%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 1997 Explorer
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 85 21.2%
2022 72 18.1%
2023 56 28.6%
2024 38 18.4%
2025 39 20.5%

What to check before buying a 1997 Explorer

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: suspension accounted for 11.0% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 1997 Ford Explorers pass their MOT?

78.6% of the 290 1997 Ford Explorer MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 21.4% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 1997 Ford Explorer?

Suspension, recorded in 11.0% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (10.7%).

Does the 1997 Explorer get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 12.2% in the 60-90k band to 23.3% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 290 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data