2019 Ford Allied — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 5,581 MOT tests, the 2019 Ford Allied recorded an 87.2% pass rate. That is 2.7 percentage points worse than all cars of a similar age, which fail at 10.1%. Failures cluster in visibility, lighting & signalling and tyres.

87%
Pass rate
5,581
MOT tests analysed
12.8%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
4.4
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — visibility (5.4%) and lighting & signalling (4.8%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are wipers, brake pads and headlamp aim — wipers alone was recorded 282 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 9.5% in the 0-30k band and 16.9% in the 150k+ band, a 7.3-point spread.

Tyres is the most common advisory, noted on 18.9% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is worsening — 8.7% of tests failed in 2021 against 14.6% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2019 Allied 12.8% cars avg 10.4% National avg 10.1%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2019 Ford Allied
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Visibility 5.4% 301
2 Lighting & signalling 4.8% 268
3 Tyres 3.7% 209
4 Brakes 2.8% 155
5 Suspension 1.9% 109
6 Body, structure & corrosion 1.7% 92
Share of tests failing on each category Visibility 5.4% Lighting & signalling 4.8% Tyres 3.7% Brakes 2.8% Suspension 1.9% Body, structure & corrosion 1.7%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2019 Ford Allied
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Wipers282
2Brake pads97
3Headlamp aim94
4Linkage pins and bushes90
5Tread depth81
6Headlamp61

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2019 Ford Allied
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 18.9% 1,052
2 Brakes 14.3% 799
3 Other defects 7.3% 410
4 Suspension 6.3% 350
5 Visibility 5.1% 285
6 Lighting & signalling 3.7% 209

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 9.5% 30-60k 14.7% 60-90k 17.1% 90-120k 18.2% 120-150k 15.5% 150k+ 16.9%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2019 Allied
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 2,618 9.5%
30-60k 1,804 14.7%
60-90k 598 17.1%
90-120k 247 18.2%
120-150k 142 15.5%
150k+ 172 16.9%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 2 yrs 8.7% 3 yrs 9.9% 4 yrs 12.2% 5 yrs 14.8% 6 yrs 14.6%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2019 Allied
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 231 8.7%
2022 1,276 9.9%
2023 1,329 12.2%
2024 1,368 14.8%
2025 1,377 14.6%

What to check before buying a 2019 Allied

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: visibility accounted for 5.4% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2019 Ford Allieds pass their MOT?

87.2% of the 5,581 2019 Ford Allied MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 12.8% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2019 Ford Allied?

Visibility, recorded in 5.4% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (4.8%).

Does the 2019 Allied get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 9.5% in the 0-30k band to 16.9% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 5,581 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data