2017 Ford Allied — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 2,511 MOT tests, the 2017 Ford Allied recorded an 82.0% pass rate. That is 5.2 percentage points worse than all cars of a similar age, which fail at 12.8%. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and brakes.

82%
Pass rate
2,511
MOT tests analysed
18.0%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
6.1
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (6.7%) and suspension (6.3%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are pins and bushes, linkage pins and bushes and joints — pins and bushes alone was recorded 94 times.

A 150k+ example is materially riskier than a 0-30k one: 25.3% versus 9.1%.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 21.3% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is worsening — 13.9% of tests failed in 2021 against 20.3% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2017 Allied 18.0% cars avg 12.2% National avg 12.8%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2017 Ford Allied
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 6.7% 169
2 Suspension 6.3% 157
3 Brakes 4.3% 107
4 Visibility 4.2% 105
5 Body, structure & corrosion 3.9% 98
6 Tyres 3.5% 89
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 6.7% Suspension 6.3% Brakes 4.3% Visibility 4.2% Body, structure & corrosion 3.9% Tyres 3.5%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2017 Ford Allied
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Pins and bushes94
2Linkage pins and bushes83
3Joints79
4Wipers74
5Headlamp aim54
6Stop lamp52

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2017 Ford Allied
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 21.3% 534
2 Suspension 19.1% 479
3 Tyres 17.6% 441
4 Other defects 6.7% 169
5 Lighting & signalling 5.7% 142
6 Visibility 5.5% 138

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 9.1% 30-60k 17.9% 60-90k 21.9% 90-120k 21.6% 120-150k 23.3% 150k+ 25.3%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2017 Allied
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 604 9.1%
30-60k 847 17.9%
60-90k 388 21.9%
90-120k 176 21.6%
120-150k 159 23.3%
150k+ 336 25.3%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 4 yrs 13.9% 5 yrs 16.2% 6 yrs 19.7% 7 yrs 19.4% 8 yrs 20.3%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2017 Allied
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 453 13.9%
2022 488 16.2%
2023 529 19.7%
2024 520 19.4%
2025 521 20.3%

What to check before buying a 2017 Allied

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 6.7% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2017 Ford Allieds pass their MOT?

82.0% of the 2,511 2017 Ford Allied MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 18.0% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2017 Ford Allied?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 6.7% of tests, followed by suspension (6.3%).

Does the 2017 Allied get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 9.1% in the 0-30k band to 25.3% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 2,511 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data