2015 Fiat Qubo — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 1,164 MOT tests, the 2015 Fiat Qubo recorded an 80.5% pass rate. MPVs of a similar age fail 17.1% of the time, so this is 2.4pp worse than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in suspension, tyres and visibility.

81%
Pass rate
1,164
MOT tests analysed
19.5%
Fail rate
worse than
vs MPVs of similar age
8
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Suspension dominates the failure mix at 11.0% of all tests — 4.6 points clear of tyres, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are coil spring, shock absorbers and tread depth — coil spring alone was recorded 85 times.

Mileage matters less than usual here: the 2015 Qubo fails 15.9% of the time in the 0-30k band and 18.9% at 90-120k, a spread of only 3.0 points.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: tyres was flagged on 26.3% of tests without failing them.

The trend is worsening — 17.6% of tests failed in 2021 against 21.4% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2015 Qubo 19.5% MPVs avg 17.1% National avg 16.4%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2015 Fiat Qubo
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Suspension 11.0% 128
2 Tyres 6.4% 74
3 Visibility 2.8% 33
4 Lighting & signalling 2.8% 33
5 Brakes 2.2% 26
6 Emissions & environmental 1.1% 13
Share of tests failing on each category Suspension 11.0% Tyres 6.4% Visibility 2.8% Lighting & signalling 2.8% Brakes 2.2% Emissions & environmental 1.1%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2015 Fiat Qubo
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Coil spring85
2Shock absorbers65
3Tread depth36
4Wipers30
5Headlamp aim16
6Macpherson strut16

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2015 Fiat Qubo
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 26.3% 306
2 Brakes 13.2% 154
3 Suspension 11.8% 137
4 Other defects 6.0% 70
5 Emissions & environmental 4.5% 53
6 Steering 3.4% 40

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 15.9% 30-60k 20.8% 60-90k 23.3% 90-120k 18.9%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2015 Qubo
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 428 15.9%
30-60k 504 20.8%
60-90k 180 23.3%
90-120k 37 18.9%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 6 yrs 17.6% 7 yrs 17.4% 8 yrs 18.5% 9 yrs 22.5% 10 yrs 21.4%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

By fuel type

Fail rate by fuel type — 2015 Qubo
Fuel Tests Fail rate
Diesel 871 21.2%
Petrol 293 14.3%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2015 Qubo
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 238 17.6%
2022 230 17.4%
2023 227 18.5%
2024 240 22.5%
2025 229 21.4%

What to check before buying a 2015 Qubo

On a 2015 Qubo, suspension is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 11.0% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2015 Fiat Qubos pass their MOT?

80.5% of the 1,164 2015 Fiat Qubo MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 19.5% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2015 Fiat Qubo?

Suspension, recorded in 11.0% of tests, followed by tyres (6.4%).

Does the 2015 Qubo get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 15.9% in the 0-30k band to 18.9% in the 90-120k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 1,164 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data