2010 Dodge Journey — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2010 Dodge Journey passed 70.5% of its 2,188 recorded MOT tests. That is 4.0 percentage points worse than MPVs of a similar age, which fail at 25.5%. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and brakes.

71%
Pass rate
2,188
MOT tests analysed
29.5%
Fail rate
worse than
vs MPVs of similar age
12.6
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: lighting & signalling, recorded in 18.6% of tests against 14.6% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are ball joint, position lamp and rbt (sp) — ball joint alone was recorded 256 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 22.8% in the 30-60k band and 29.0% in the 150k+ band, a 6.2-point spread.

Suspension is the most common advisory, noted on 39.8% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2010 Journey 29.5% MPVs avg 25.5% National avg 24.0%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2010 Dodge Journey
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 18.6% 407
2 Suspension 14.6% 319
3 Brakes 13.8% 302
4 Steering 7.2% 157
5 Tyres 5.2% 113
6 Emissions & environmental 4.8% 104
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 18.6% Suspension 14.6% Brakes 13.8% Steering 7.2% Tyres 5.2% Emissions & environmental 4.8%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2010 Dodge Journey
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Ball joint256
2Position lamp198
3Rbt (sp)155
4Track rod end153
5Stop lamp150
6Service brake performance109

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2010 Dodge Journey
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 39.8% 870
2 Tyres 31.0% 679
3 Brakes 30.1% 658
4 Other defects 15.1% 330
5 Steering 10.6% 232
6 Emissions & environmental 9.4% 205

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 22.8% 60-90k 27.9% 90-120k 30.6% 120-150k 31.8% 150k+ 29.0%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2010 Journey
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 127 22.8%
60-90k 616 27.9%
90-120k 825 30.6%
120-150k 446 31.8%
150k+ 162 29.0%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 11 yrs 29.4% 12 yrs 27.8% 13 yrs 29.1% 14 yrs 31.7% 15 yrs 30.7%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

By fuel type

Fail rate by fuel type — 2010 Journey
Fuel Tests Fail rate
Diesel 2,096 29.5%
Petrol 92 28.3%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2010 Journey
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 582 29.4%
2022 529 27.8%
2023 450 29.1%
2024 360 31.7%
2025 267 30.7%

What to check before buying a 2010 Journey

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 18.6% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2010 Dodge Journeys pass their MOT?

70.5% of the 2,188 2010 Dodge Journey MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 29.5% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2010 Dodge Journey?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 18.6% of tests, followed by suspension (14.6%).

Does the 2010 Journey get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 22.8% in the 30-60k band to 29.0% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 2,188 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data