2002 Daihatsu Yrv — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 316 MOT tests, the 2002 Daihatsu Yrv recorded a 69.0% pass rate. All cars of a similar age fail 27.5% of the time, so this is 3.5pp worse than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and body, structure & corrosion.

69%
Pass rate
316
MOT tests analysed
31.0%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
20.4
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: lighting & signalling, recorded in 21.5% of tests against 14.6% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are component mounting prescribed areas, headlamp aim and stop lamp — component mounting prescribed areas alone was recorded 57 times.

A 90-120k example is materially riskier than a 30-60k one: 30.9% versus 25.4%.

Suspension is the most common advisory, noted on 44.9% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 32.7% in 2021 to 28.1% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2002 Yrv 31.0% cars avg 24.3% National avg 27.5%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2002 Daihatsu Yrv
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 21.5% 68
2 Suspension 14.6% 46
3 Body, structure & corrosion 10.4% 33
4 Emissions & environmental 8.9% 28
5 Brakes 7.9% 25
6 Seat belts & restraints 5.1% 16
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 21.5% Suspension 14.6% Body, structure & corrosion 10.4% Emissions & environmental 8.9% Brakes 7.9% Seat belts & restraints 5.1%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2002 Daihatsu Yrv
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Component mounting prescribed areas57
2Headlamp aim33
3Stop lamp22
4Prescribed areas20
5Position lamp19
6Headlamp17

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2002 Daihatsu Yrv
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 44.9% 142
2 Brakes 35.1% 111
3 Tyres 30.1% 95
4 Body, structure & corrosion 28.2% 89
5 Other defects 23.7% 75
6 Lighting & signalling 20.9% 66

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 25.4% 60-90k 36.6% 90-120k 30.9%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2002 Yrv
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 63 25.4%
60-90k 134 36.6%
90-120k 81 30.9%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 19 yrs 32.7% 20 yrs 29.7% 21 yrs 33.9% 22 yrs 27.3% 23 yrs 28.1%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2002 Yrv
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 104 32.7%
2022 74 29.7%
2023 62 33.9%
2024 44 27.3%
2025 32 28.1%

What to check before buying a 2002 Yrv

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 21.5% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2002 Daihatsu Yrvs pass their MOT?

69.0% of the 316 2002 Daihatsu Yrv MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 31.0% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2002 Daihatsu Yrv?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 21.5% of tests, followed by suspension (14.6%).

Does the 2002 Yrv get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 25.4% in the 30-60k band to 30.9% in the 90-120k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 316 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data