2010 Daihatsu Sirion — MOT failures & pass rate

693 MOT tests on the 2010 Daihatsu Sirion are in this dataset, and 79.7% of them passed. City cars of a similar age fail 24.3% of the time, so this is 3.9pp better than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in suspension, lighting & signalling and brakes.

80%
Pass rate
693
MOT tests analysed
20.3%
Fail rate
better than
vs city cars of similar age
13
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — suspension (10.7%) and lighting & signalling (7.9%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are ball joint, rigid brake pipes and wipers — ball joint alone was recorded 44 times.

A 90-120k example is materially riskier than a 0-30k one: 30.8% versus 10.3%.

Suspension is the most common advisory, noted on 34.6% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is worsening — 18.5% of tests failed in 2021 against 27.9% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2010 Sirion 20.3% city cars avg 24.3% National avg 24.4%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2010 Daihatsu Sirion
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Suspension 10.7% 74
2 Lighting & signalling 7.9% 55
3 Brakes 6.1% 42
4 Tyres 4.3% 30
5 Visibility 4.2% 29
6 Body, structure & corrosion 3.0% 21
Share of tests failing on each category Suspension 10.7% Lighting & signalling 7.9% Brakes 6.1% Tyres 4.3% Visibility 4.2% Body, structure & corrosion 3.0%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2010 Daihatsu Sirion
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Ball joint44
2Rigid brake pipes31
3Wipers30
4Linkage ball joints29
5Headlamp aim27
6Stop lamp18

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2010 Daihatsu Sirion
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 34.6% 240
2 Brakes 30.7% 213
3 Tyres 22.9% 159
4 Other defects 15.7% 109
5 Body, structure & corrosion 8.5% 59
6 Lighting & signalling 5.3% 37

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 10.3% 30-60k 16.3% 60-90k 21.7% 90-120k 30.8%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2010 Sirion
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 68 10.3%
30-60k 277 16.3%
60-90k 207 21.7%
90-120k 104 30.8%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 11 yrs 18.5% 12 yrs 17.4% 13 yrs 19.0% 14 yrs 18.9% 15 yrs 27.9%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2010 Sirion
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 146 18.5%
2022 138 17.4%
2023 137 19.0%
2024 132 18.9%
2025 140 27.9%

What to check before buying a 2010 Sirion

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: suspension accounted for 10.7% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2010 Daihatsu Sirions pass their MOT?

79.7% of the 693 2010 Daihatsu Sirion MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 20.3% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2010 Daihatsu Sirion?

Suspension, recorded in 10.7% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (7.9%).

Does the 2010 Sirion get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 10.3% in the 0-30k band to 30.8% in the 90-120k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 693 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data