Mitsubishi L200 vs Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab
The Mitsubishi L200 has the better MOT record of the two — 19.8% fail rate versus 28.6% for the Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab across comparable years. The biggest single difference is body, structure & corrosion, where the L200 Double Cab records failures noticeably more often.
19.8%
L200 fail rate
28.6%
L200 Double Cab fail rate
8.85pp
Difference
Side by side
| Metric | Mitsubishi L200 | Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab |
|---|---|---|
| MOT tests analysed | 453,482 | 76,790 |
| Pass rate | 80.2% | 71.4% |
| Fail rate | 19.8% | 28.6% |
Where they differ
| Category | L200 | L200 Double Cab |
|---|---|---|
| Body, structure & corrosion | 4.7% | 12.4% |
| Lighting & signalling | 13.7% | 20.8% |
| Suspension | 8.1% | 14.5% |
| Brakes | 8.3% | 11.1% |
| Visibility | 4.5% | 6.2% |
Methodology & source. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.