Isuzu D Max vs Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab
On MOT-testable defects the Isuzu D Max comes out ahead: 18.4% of its tests record a failure against 28.6% for the Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab, a 10.2-point gap. The biggest single difference is lighting & signalling, where the L200 Double Cab records failures noticeably more often.
18.4%
D Max fail rate
28.6%
L200 Double Cab fail rate
10.22pp
Difference
Side by side
| Metric | Isuzu D Max | Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab |
|---|---|---|
| MOT tests analysed | 160,540 | 76,790 |
| Pass rate | 81.6% | 71.4% |
| Fail rate | 18.4% | 28.6% |
Where they differ
| Category | D Max | L200 Double Cab |
|---|---|---|
| Lighting & signalling | 10.3% | 20.8% |
| Body, structure & corrosion | 3.9% | 12.4% |
| Suspension | 7.8% | 14.5% |
| Brakes | 6.7% | 11.1% |
| Visibility | 4.3% | 6.2% |
Methodology & source. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.