Ford Ranger vs Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab
On MOT-testable defects the Ford Ranger comes out ahead: 19.2% of its tests record a failure against 28.6% for the Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab, a 9.4-point gap. The biggest single difference is lighting & signalling, where the L200 Double Cab records failures noticeably more often.
19.2%
Ranger fail rate
28.6%
L200 Double Cab fail rate
9.42pp
Difference
Side by side
| Metric | Ford Ranger | Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab |
|---|---|---|
| MOT tests analysed | 608,396 | 76,790 |
| Pass rate | 80.8% | 71.4% |
| Fail rate | 19.2% | 28.6% |
Where they differ
| Category | Ranger | L200 Double Cab |
|---|---|---|
| Lighting & signalling | 10.7% | 20.8% |
| Body, structure & corrosion | 4.2% | 12.4% |
| Suspension | 8.0% | 14.5% |
| Visibility | 0.0% | 6.2% |
| Brakes | 6.3% | 11.1% |
| Tyres | 3.2% | 0.0% |
Methodology & source. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.