2016 Citroen Nemo — MOT failures & pass rate

6,817 MOT tests on the 2016 Citroen Nemo are in this dataset, and 77.0% of them passed. Vans of a similar age fail 19.5% of the time, so this is 3.6pp worse than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in suspension, lighting & signalling and tyres.

77%
Pass rate
6,817
MOT tests analysed
23.1%
Fail rate
worse than
vs vans of similar age
7
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: suspension, recorded in 13.5% of tests against 10.5% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are shock absorbers, coil spring and tread depth — shock absorbers alone was recorded 529 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 15.6% of 0-30k cars fail, rising to 25.3% once past 150k.

Tyres is the most common advisory, noted on 29.8% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is worsening — 19.3% of tests failed in 2021 against 25.4% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2016 Nemo 23.1% vans avg 19.5% National avg 14.5%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2016 Citroen Nemo
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Suspension 13.5% 920
2 Lighting & signalling 10.5% 713
3 Tyres 8.0% 542
4 Visibility 5.7% 386
5 Brakes 4.2% 287
6 Emissions & environmental 2.4% 161
Share of tests failing on each category Suspension 13.5% Lighting & signalling 10.5% Tyres 8.0% Visibility 5.7% Brakes 4.2% Emissions & environmental 2.4%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2016 Citroen Nemo
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Shock absorbers529
2Coil spring523
3Tread depth335
4Position lamp239
5Registration plate lamp(s)210
6Washers206

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2016 Citroen Nemo
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 29.8% 2,035
2 Suspension 14.0% 951
3 Brakes 12.6% 857
4 Visibility 8.8% 603
5 Emissions & environmental 8.8% 602
6 Lighting & signalling 7.8% 532

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 15.6% 30-60k 20.2% 60-90k 24.1% 90-120k 26.0% 120-150k 25.6% 150k+ 25.3%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2016 Nemo
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 448 15.6%
30-60k 1,860 20.2%
60-90k 2,096 24.1%
90-120k 1,354 26.0%
120-150k 671 25.6%
150k+ 388 25.3%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 5 yrs 19.3% 6 yrs 21.2% 7 yrs 24.9% 8 yrs 24.6% 9 yrs 25.4%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2016 Nemo
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 1,393 19.3%
2022 1,387 21.2%
2023 1,415 24.9%
2024 1,332 24.6%
2025 1,290 25.4%

What to check before buying a 2016 Nemo

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: suspension accounted for 13.5% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2016 Citroen Nemos pass their MOT?

77.0% of the 6,817 2016 Citroen Nemo MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 23.1% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2016 Citroen Nemo?

Suspension, recorded in 13.5% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (10.5%).

Does the 2016 Nemo get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 15.6% in the 0-30k band to 25.3% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 6,817 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data