2010 Chrysler 300 — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2010 Chrysler 300 passed 73.2% of its 932 recorded MOT tests. That is 2.5 percentage points worse than all cars of a similar age, which fail at 24.3%. Failures cluster in brakes, lighting & signalling and suspension.

73%
Pass rate
932
MOT tests analysed
26.8%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
12.9
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: brakes, recorded in 18.2% of tests against 10.7% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are rbt (sp), pins and bushes and position lamp — rbt (sp) alone was recorded 111 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 13.0% of 0-30k cars fail, rising to 30.5% once past 150k — 2.3× the risk.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 35.7% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 29.9% in 2021 to 22.1% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2010 300 26.8% cars avg 20.7% National avg 24.3%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2010 Chrysler 300
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Brakes 18.2% 170
2 Lighting & signalling 10.7% 100
3 Suspension 10.2% 95
4 Steering 6.4% 60
5 Tyres 4.2% 39
6 Visibility 3.3% 31
Share of tests failing on each category Brakes 18.2% Lighting & signalling 10.7% Suspension 10.2% Steering 6.4% Tyres 4.2% Visibility 3.3%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2010 Chrysler 300
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Rbt (sp)111
2Pins and bushes71
3Position lamp65
4Track rod end65
5Ball joint48
6Tread depth41

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2010 Chrysler 300
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 35.7% 333
2 Suspension 31.8% 296
3 Tyres 22.8% 212
4 Emissions & environmental 16.0% 149
5 Other defects 8.9% 83
6 Lighting & signalling 8.1% 75

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 13.0% 30-60k 24.8% 60-90k 26.6% 90-120k 28.1% 120-150k 26.6% 150k+ 30.5%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2010 300
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 46 13.0%
30-60k 105 24.8%
60-90k 218 26.6%
90-120k 242 28.1%
120-150k 154 26.6%
150k+ 167 30.5%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 11 yrs 29.9% 12 yrs 27.2% 13 yrs 24.9% 14 yrs 29.0% 15 yrs 22.1%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2010 300
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 211 29.9%
2022 202 27.2%
2023 185 24.9%
2024 176 29.0%
2025 158 22.1%

What to check before buying a 2010 300

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: brakes accounted for 18.2% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2010 Chrysler 300s pass their MOT?

73.2% of the 932 2010 Chrysler 300 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 26.8% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2010 Chrysler 300?

Brakes, recorded in 18.2% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (10.7%).

Does the 2010 300 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 13.0% in the 0-30k band to 30.5% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 932 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data