2005 Chrysler 300 C — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2005 Chrysler 300 C passed 78.3% of its 345 recorded MOT tests. All cars of a similar age fail 27.6% of the time, so this is 5.9pp better than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in brakes, lighting & signalling and suspension.

78%
Pass rate
345
MOT tests analysed
21.7%
Fail rate
better than
vs cars of similar age
17.8
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: brakes, recorded in 14.2% of tests against 8.1% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are rbt (sp), service brake performance and malfunction indicator lamp — rbt (sp) alone was recorded 32 times.

Mileage matters less than usual here: the 2005 300 C fails 23.3% of the time in the 30-60k band and 21.6% at 150k+, a spread of only 1.7 points.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 27.8% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is worsening — 18.7% of tests failed in 2021 against 25.4% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2005 300 C 21.7% cars avg 24.0% National avg 27.6%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2005 Chrysler 300 C
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Brakes 14.2% 49
2 Lighting & signalling 8.1% 28
3 Suspension 7.5% 26
4 Emissions & environmental 5.5% 19
5 Visibility 3.8% 13
6 Steering 3.5% 12
Share of tests failing on each category Brakes 14.2% Lighting & signalling 8.1% Suspension 7.5% Emissions & environmental 5.5% Visibility 3.8% Steering 3.5%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2005 Chrysler 300 C
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Rbt (sp)32
2Service brake performance19
3Malfunction indicator lamp19
4Position lamp18
5Ball joint14
6Pins and bushes13

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2005 Chrysler 300 C
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 27.8% 96
2 Suspension 23.8% 82
3 Tyres 20.0% 69
4 Lighting & signalling 8.7% 30
5 Steering 7.0% 24
6 Other defects 6.4% 22

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 23.3% 60-90k 23.7% 90-120k 18.5% 120-150k 21.2% 150k+ 21.6%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2005 300 C
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 30 23.3%
60-90k 156 23.7%
90-120k 81 18.5%
120-150k 33 21.2%
150k+ 37 21.6%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 16 yrs 18.7% 17 yrs 23.4% 18 yrs 18.9% 19 yrs 23.4% 20 yrs 25.4%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2005 300 C
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 75 18.7%
2022 77 23.4%
2023 74 18.9%
2024 64 23.4%
2025 55 25.4%

What to check before buying a 2005 300 C

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: brakes accounted for 14.2% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2005 Chrysler 300 Cs pass their MOT?

78.3% of the 345 2005 Chrysler 300 C MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 21.7% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2005 Chrysler 300 C?

Brakes, recorded in 14.2% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (8.1%).

Does the 2005 300 C get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 23.3% in the 30-60k band to 21.6% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 345 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data