2004 Chrysler-Jeep Crossfire — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 681 MOT tests, the 2004 Chrysler-Jeep Crossfire recorded a 74.6% pass rate. Against all cars of a similar age (27.7% fail rate), the 2004 Crossfire comes out 2.3pp better. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and brakes.

75%
Pass rate
681
MOT tests analysed
25.4%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
18.8
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Lighting & signalling dominates the failure mix at 16.2% of all tests — 3.1 points clear of suspension, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are headlamp aim, component mounting prescribed areas and coil spring — headlamp aim alone was recorded 77 times.

A 120-150k example is materially riskier than a 30-60k one: 37.0% versus 20.1%.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: brakes was flagged on 28.6% of tests without failing them.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2004 Crossfire 25.4% cars avg 24.3% National avg 27.7%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2004 Chrysler-Jeep Crossfire
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 16.2% 110
2 Suspension 13.1% 89
3 Brakes 7.3% 50
4 Tyres 4.3% 29
5 Visibility 4.1% 28
6 Emissions & environmental 3.5% 24
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 16.2% Suspension 13.1% Brakes 7.3% Tyres 4.3% Visibility 4.1% Emissions & environmental 3.5%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2004 Chrysler-Jeep Crossfire
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Headlamp aim77
2Component mounting prescribed areas54
3Coil spring48
4Individual direction indicators35
5Headlamp31
6Rigid brake pipes25

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2004 Chrysler-Jeep Crossfire
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 28.6% 195
2 Suspension 27.5% 187
3 Tyres 21.9% 149
4 Lighting & signalling 17.3% 118
5 Emissions & environmental 15.7% 107
6 Body, structure & corrosion 10.6% 72

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 20.1% 60-90k 26.6% 90-120k 24.6% 120-150k 37.0%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2004 Crossfire
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 174 20.1%
60-90k 241 26.6%
90-120k 142 24.6%
120-150k 73 37.0%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 17 yrs 24.2% 18 yrs 27.2% 19 yrs 29.7% 20 yrs 21.9% 21 yrs 22.7%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2004 Crossfire
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 161 24.2%
2022 151 27.2%
2023 145 29.7%
2024 114 21.9%
2025 110 22.7%

What to check before buying a 2004 Crossfire

On a 2004 Crossfire, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 16.2% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2004 Chrysler-Jeep Crossfires pass their MOT?

74.6% of the 681 2004 Chrysler-Jeep Crossfire MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 25.4% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2004 Chrysler-Jeep Crossfire?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 16.2% of tests, followed by suspension (13.1%).

Does the 2004 Crossfire get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 20.1% in the 30-60k band to 37.0% in the 120-150k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 681 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data