2010 Chevrolet Matiz — MOT failures & pass rate

6,298 MOT tests on the 2010 Chevrolet Matiz are in this dataset, and 71.6% of them passed. Against city cars of a similar age (23.9% fail rate), the 2010 Matiz comes out 4.5pp worse. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and brakes.

72%
Pass rate
6,298
MOT tests analysed
28.4%
Fail rate
worse than
vs city cars of similar age
12.8
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (15.1%) and suspension (13.7%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are ball joint, service brake performance and wipers — ball joint alone was recorded 454 times.

A 90-120k example is materially riskier than a 0-30k one: 35.2% versus 20.5%.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 33.7% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is worsening — 26.6% of tests failed in 2021 against 30.3% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2010 Matiz 28.4% city cars avg 23.9% National avg 24.2%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2010 Chevrolet Matiz
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 15.1% 950
2 Suspension 13.7% 860
3 Brakes 12.4% 784
4 Visibility 7.3% 461
5 Tyres 6.4% 404
6 Body, structure & corrosion 5.3% 333
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 15.1% Suspension 13.7% Brakes 12.4% Visibility 7.3% Tyres 6.4% Body, structure & corrosion 5.3%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2010 Chevrolet Matiz
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Ball joint454
2Service brake performance396
3Wipers385
4Rigid brake pipes353
5Position lamp346
6Tread depth297

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2010 Chevrolet Matiz
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 33.7% 2,120
2 Suspension 30.8% 1,942
3 Tyres 27.8% 1,750
4 Body, structure & corrosion 11.7% 739
5 Other defects 10.3% 649
6 Emissions & environmental 8.8% 554

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 20.5% 30-60k 28.3% 60-90k 31.9% 90-120k 35.2%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2010 Matiz
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 1,046 20.5%
30-60k 3,128 28.3%
60-90k 1,755 31.9%
90-120k 338 35.2%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 11 yrs 26.6% 12 yrs 28.3% 13 yrs 29.1% 14 yrs 28.6% 15 yrs 30.3%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2010 Matiz
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 1,530 26.6%
2022 1,429 28.3%
2023 1,319 29.1%
2024 1,103 28.6%
2025 917 30.3%

What to check before buying a 2010 Matiz

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 15.1% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2010 Chevrolet Matizs pass their MOT?

71.6% of the 6,298 2010 Chevrolet Matiz MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 28.4% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2010 Chevrolet Matiz?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 15.1% of tests, followed by suspension (13.7%).

Does the 2010 Matiz get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 20.5% in the 0-30k band to 35.2% in the 90-120k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 6,298 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data