2010 BMW X6 — MOT failures & pass rate

4,528 MOT tests on the 2010 BMW X6 are in this dataset, and 83.3% of them passed. That is 3.8 percentage points better than large SUVs of a similar age, which fail at 20.5%. Failures cluster in suspension, lighting & signalling and tyres.

83%
Pass rate
4,528
MOT tests analysed
16.7%
Fail rate
better than
vs large SUVs of similar age
12.9
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — suspension (7.8%) and lighting & signalling (6.7%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are coil spring, ball joint and tread depth — coil spring alone was recorded 214 times.

A 150k+ example is materially riskier than a 30-60k one: 18.5% versus 11.5%.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: tyres was flagged on 24.9% of tests without failing them.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2010 X6 16.7% large SUVs avg 20.5% National avg 24.3%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2010 BMW X6
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Suspension 7.8% 354
2 Lighting & signalling 6.7% 301
3 Tyres 5.2% 235
4 Brakes 3.5% 160
5 Visibility 2.9% 132
6 Emissions & environmental 1.4% 63
Share of tests failing on each category Suspension 7.8% Lighting & signalling 6.7% Tyres 5.2% Brakes 3.5% Visibility 2.9% Emissions & environmental 1.4%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2010 BMW X6
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Coil spring214
2Ball joint156
3Tread depth113
4Headlamp97
5Washers96
6Headlamp aim79

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2010 BMW X6
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 24.9% 1,128
2 Suspension 21.1% 954
3 Brakes 15.6% 706
4 Emissions & environmental 12.6% 570
5 Other defects 6.3% 286
6 Lighting & signalling 6.2% 279

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 11.5% 60-90k 16.4% 90-120k 17.1% 120-150k 16.7% 150k+ 18.5%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2010 X6
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 166 11.5%
60-90k 1,010 16.4%
90-120k 1,698 17.1%
120-150k 1,134 16.7%
150k+ 491 18.5%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 11 yrs 16.8% 12 yrs 15.7% 13 yrs 16.9% 14 yrs 17.9% 15 yrs 16.4%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

By fuel type

Fail rate by fuel type — 2010 X6
Fuel Tests Fail rate
Diesel 4,397 16.9%
Petrol 127 13.4%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2010 X6
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 1,005 16.8%
2022 952 15.7%
2023 921 16.9%
2024 866 17.9%
2025 784 16.4%

What to check before buying a 2010 X6

On a 2010 X6, suspension is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 7.8% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2010 BMW X6s pass their MOT?

83.3% of the 4,528 2010 BMW X6 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 16.7% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2010 BMW X6?

Suspension, recorded in 7.8% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (6.7%).

Does the 2010 X6 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 11.5% in the 30-60k band to 18.5% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 4,528 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data