2016 BMW M5 — MOT failures & pass rate

2,130 MOT tests on the 2016 BMW M5 are in this dataset, and 92.2% of them passed. Against executive cars of a similar age (12.7% fail rate), the 2016 M5 comes out 4.8pp better. Failures cluster in tyres, lighting & signalling and visibility.

92%
Pass rate
2,130
MOT tests analysed
7.8%
Fail rate
better than
vs executive cars of similar age
7
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — tyres (3.4%) and lighting & signalling (2.2%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are catalyst emissions, side repeaters and wipers — catalyst emissions alone was recorded 32 times.

Mileage matters less than usual here: the 2016 M5 fails 6.6% of the time in the 0-30k band and 8.3% at 90-120k, a spread of only 1.7 points.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: tyres was flagged on 14.0% of tests without failing them.

The trend is worsening — 7.1% of tests failed in 2021 against 9.6% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2016 M5 7.8% executive cars avg 12.7% National avg 14.4%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2016 BMW M5
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Tyres 3.4% 73
2 Lighting & signalling 2.2% 46
3 Visibility 1.7% 37
4 Emissions & environmental 1.2% 26
5 Suspension 0.9% 19
6 Other defects 0.5% 11
Share of tests failing on each category Tyres 3.4% Lighting & signalling 2.2% Visibility 1.7% Emissions & environmental 1.2% Suspension 0.9% Other defects 0.5%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2016 BMW M5
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Catalyst emissions32
2Side repeaters32
3Wipers25
4Tread depth22
5Coil spring21
6Registration plates16

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2016 BMW M5
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 14.0% 298
2 Brakes 8.7% 185
3 Other defects 4.0% 86
4 Visibility 2.8% 60
5 Emissions & environmental 2.0% 42
6 Suspension 1.1% 24

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 6.6% 30-60k 7.2% 60-90k 10.3% 90-120k 8.3%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2016 M5
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 410 6.6%
30-60k 1,203 7.2%
60-90k 457 10.3%
90-120k 48 8.3%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 5 yrs 7.1% 6 yrs 8.0% 7 yrs 5.6% 8 yrs 8.9% 9 yrs 9.6%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2016 M5
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 451 7.1%
2022 438 8.0%
2023 411 5.6%
2024 425 8.9%
2025 405 9.6%

What to check before buying a 2016 M5

On a 2016 M5, tyres is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 3.4% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2016 BMW M5s pass their MOT?

92.2% of the 2,130 2016 BMW M5 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 7.8% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2016 BMW M5?

Tyres, recorded in 3.4% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (2.2%).

Does the 2016 M5 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 6.6% in the 0-30k band to 8.3% in the 90-120k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 2,130 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data