2018 BMW i3 — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2018 BMW i3 passed 92.1% of its 16,712 recorded MOT tests. That is 2.5 percentage points better than small family cars of a similar age, which fail at 10.4%. Failures cluster in tyres, lighting & signalling and visibility.

92%
Pass rate
16,712
MOT tests analysed
7.9%
Fail rate
better than
vs small family cars of similar age
5
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Tyres dominates the failure mix at 5.3% of all tests — 3.1 points clear of lighting & signalling, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are tread depth, headlamp aim and washers — tread depth alone was recorded 466 times.

Mileage matters less than usual here: the 2018 i3 fails 6.3% of the time in the 0-30k band and 8.6% at 120-150k, a spread of only 2.3 points.

Fuel type barely separates them — electric fails 7.8% of the time against 8.0% for hybrid.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: tyres was flagged on 24.0% of tests without failing them.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2018 i3 7.9% small family cars avg 10.4% National avg 11.0%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2018 BMW i3
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Tyres 5.3% 886
2 Lighting & signalling 2.2% 374
3 Visibility 1.7% 291
4 Suspension 0.5% 90
5 Brakes 0.5% 89
6 Road wheels 0.3% 48
Share of tests failing on each category Tyres 5.3% Lighting & signalling 2.2% Visibility 1.7% Suspension 0.5% Brakes 0.5% Road wheels 0.3%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2018 BMW i3
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Tread depth466
2Headlamp aim428
3Washers227
4Wipers99
5Side repeaters56
6Registration plates53

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2018 BMW i3
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 24.0% 4,007
2 Brakes 6.4% 1,073
3 Other defects 4.5% 747
4 Visibility 2.5% 418
5 Road wheels 2.2% 366
6 Suspension 1.0% 173

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 6.3% 30-60k 9.1% 60-90k 10.7% 90-120k 12.4% 120-150k 8.6%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2018 i3
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 8,409 6.3%
30-60k 6,430 9.1%
60-90k 1,608 10.7%
90-120k 217 12.4%
120-150k 35 8.6%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 3 yrs 7.4% 4 yrs 6.8% 5 yrs 7.6% 6 yrs 9.1% 7 yrs 8.6%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

By fuel type

Fail rate by fuel type — 2018 i3
Fuel Tests Fail rate
Hybrid 10,665 8.0%
Electric 6,047 7.8%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2018 i3
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 3,416 7.4%
2022 3,327 6.8%
2023 3,291 7.6%
2024 3,323 9.1%
2025 3,355 8.6%

What to check before buying a 2018 i3

On a 2018 i3, tyres is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 5.3% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2018 BMW i3s pass their MOT?

92.1% of the 16,712 2018 BMW i3 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 7.9% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2018 BMW i3?

Tyres, recorded in 5.3% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (2.2%).

Does the 2018 i3 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 6.3% in the 0-30k band to 8.6% in the 120-150k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 16,712 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data