BMW 420d — MOT pass rate & failures

The BMW 420d recorded a 87.3% MOT pass rate across 240,913 tests in this dataset (model years 2013–2023), with tyres, lighting & signalling and brakes its most common failure areas. Its 12.7% fail rate is higher than the 11.8% average across all BMW 4 Series versions.

87%
Pass rate
240,913
MOT tests analysed
12.7%
Fail rate
worse than
vs coupes & convertibles of similar age
2013–2023
Model years

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) BMW 420d 12.7% All 4 Series versions 11.8% coupes & convertibles avg 10.8% National avg 14.2%
Fail rate for the 420d against the whole 4 Series range, its segment and the national average for cars of a similar age.

By model year

BMW 420d MOT results by model year
Year Tests Pass rate Fail rate
2013 2,786 83.6% 16.4%
2014 37,700 84.2% 15.8%
2015 46,547 86.1% 13.9%
2016 50,712 87.8% 12.2%
2017 49,617 88.7% 11.3%
2018 30,527 89.4% 10.6%
2019 14,626 88.4% 11.6%
2020 3,739 89.7% 10.3%
2021 3,160 88.2% 11.8%
2022 1,440 91.9% 8.1%
2023 59 93.2% 6.8%

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — BMW 420d
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Tyres 7.5% 18,104
2 Lighting & signalling 2.8% 6,741
3 Brakes 2.3% 5,570
4 Visibility 1.9% 4,610
5 Suspension 1.7% 4,127
6 Road wheels 0.8% 2,013
7 Emissions & environmental 0.5% 1,300
8 Other defects 0.5% 1,145
Share of tests failing on each category Tyres 7.5% Lighting & signalling 2.8% Brakes 2.3% Visibility 1.9% Suspension 1.7% Road wheels 0.8%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category, across all model years.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — BMW 420d
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Tread depth7,566
2Brake pads4,162
3Washers3,565
4Headlamp aim3,340
5Shock absorbers2,709
6Headlamp1,954

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — BMW 420d
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 23.1% 55,589
2 Brakes 14.7% 35,477
3 Other defects 9.0% 21,622
4 Suspension 5.5% 13,145
5 Visibility 3.1% 7,364
6 Emissions & environmental 2.4% 5,857

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 8.0% 30-60k 10.9% 60-90k 13.7% 90-120k 16.0% 120-150k 16.8% 150k+ 18.7%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — BMW 420d
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 27,282 8.0%
30-60k 85,247 10.9%
60-90k 75,738 13.7%
90-120k 36,715 16.0%
120-150k 11,836 16.8%
150k+ 4,069 18.7%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 2 yrs 5.7% 3 yrs 9.8% 4 yrs 10.0% 5 yrs 10.8% 6 yrs 11.8% 7 yrs 12.9% 8 yrs 13.5% 9 yrs 14.7% 10 yrs 16.2% 11 yrs 17.9% 12 yrs 18.3%
How the 420d's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — BMW 420d
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 44,899 11.0%
2022 47,717 11.7%
2023 48,635 12.9%
2024 49,659 13.6%
2025 50,003 13.9%

What to check before buying a BMW 420d

Focus on the areas it most often fails on — and remember MOT data covers testable defects only, not engine or gearbox health.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How reliable is the BMW 420d at MOT time?

87.3% of the 240,913 BMW 420d MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 12.7% fail rate, in line with the 11.8% average across all 4 Series versions.

What is the most common MOT failure on a BMW 420d?

Tyres, recorded in 7.5% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (2.8%).

Does the 420d get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 8.0% in the 0-30k band to 18.7% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 240,913 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-06. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data