1986 Austin Mini Piccadilly — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 262 MOT tests, the 1986 Austin Mini Piccadilly recorded a 76.3% pass rate. That is 3.3 percentage points worse than all cars of a similar age, which fail at 20.4%. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, body, structure & corrosion and emissions & environmental.

76%
Pass rate
262
MOT tests analysed
23.7%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
36.9
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: lighting & signalling, recorded in 16.8% of tests against 11.5% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are non catalyst emissions, headlamp aim and ball joint — non catalyst emissions alone was recorded 25 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 16.3% in the 0-30k band and 27.2% in the 60-90k band, a 10.8-point spread.

Suspension is the most common advisory, noted on 24.8% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 25.9% in 2021 to 20.0% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 1986 Mini Piccadilly 23.7% cars avg 19.8% National avg 20.4%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 1986 Austin Mini Piccadilly
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 16.8% 44
2 Body, structure & corrosion 11.5% 30
3 Emissions & environmental 9.9% 26
4 Brakes 9.5% 25
5 Suspension 8.0% 21
6 Steering 6.1% 16
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 16.8% Body, structure & corrosion 11.5% Emissions & environmental 9.9% Brakes 9.5% Suspension 8.0% Steering 6.1%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 1986 Austin Mini Piccadilly
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Non catalyst emissions25
2Headlamp aim21
3Ball joint15
4Rear fog lamp14
5Position lamp13
6Component mounting prescribed areas12

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 1986 Austin Mini Piccadilly
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 24.8% 65
2 Emissions & environmental 22.9% 60
3 Tyres 13.0% 34
4 Brakes 9.9% 26
5 Body, structure & corrosion 9.2% 24
6 Other defects 7.6% 20

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 16.3% 30-60k 25.4% 60-90k 27.2%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 1986 Mini Piccadilly
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 49 16.3%
30-60k 126 25.4%
60-90k 81 27.2%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 1986 Mini Piccadilly
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 54 25.9%
2022 54 25.9%
2023 56 23.2%
2024 53 22.6%
2025 45 20.0%

What to check before buying a 1986 Mini Piccadilly

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 16.8% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 1986 Austin Mini Piccadillys pass their MOT?

76.3% of the 262 1986 Austin Mini Piccadilly MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 23.7% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 1986 Austin Mini Piccadilly?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 16.8% of tests, followed by body, structure & corrosion (11.5%).

Does the 1986 Mini Piccadilly get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 16.3% in the 0-30k band to 27.2% in the 60-90k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 262 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data