Audi Rs MOT pass rate & common failures

1,214 MOT tests on the Audi Rs (2008–2015) give it an 87.3% pass rate. That is 5.7 percentage points better than all cars of a similar age, which fail at 18.4%. Its most common failure areas are tyres, suspension and lighting & signalling.

87%
Pass rate
1,214
MOT tests analysed
12.7%
Fail rate
better than
vs all cars of similar age
2008–2015
Model years covered

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — tyres (5.5%) and suspension (3.4%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are catalyst emissions, headlamp aim and brake pads — catalyst emissions alone was recorded 31 times.

A 90-120k example is materially riskier than a 0-30k one: 20.7% versus 12.3%.

Tyres is the most common advisory, noted on 18.9% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmark (lower is better) Audi Rs 12.7% all cars avg 18.4%
Fail rate for the Audi Rs against all cars of a similar age.

By model year

Every Rs model year with a usable sample. Years with their own detailed report are linked.

Audi Rs MOT results by model year
Year Tests Pass rate Fail rate Most common failure
2013 151 89.4% 10.6% Tyres
2014 1,011 86.8% 13.2% Tyres
2015 33 97.0% 3.0% Tyres

Most common failures (all years)

Most common MOT failure areas — Audi Rs
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Tyres 5.5% 67
2 Suspension 3.4% 41
3 Lighting & signalling 2.8% 34
4 Brakes 2.1% 26
5 Emissions & environmental 2.0% 24
6 Visibility 1.6% 19
7 Body, structure & corrosion 0.8% 10
8 Other defects 0.7% 8
Share of tests failing on each category Tyres 5.5% Suspension 3.4% Lighting & signalling 2.8% Brakes 2.1% Emissions & environmental 2.0% Visibility 1.6%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category, across all model years.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — Audi Rs
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Catalyst emissions31
2Headlamp aim29
3Brake pads21
4Tread depth20
5Pins and bushes18
6Coil spring16
7Shock absorbers15
8Registration plates13

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — Audi Rs
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 18.9% 230
2 Brakes 15.7% 190
3 Suspension 13.6% 165
4 Other defects 4.3% 52
5 Visibility 3.4% 41
6 Emissions & environmental 1.4% 17

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 12.3% 30-60k 11.2% 60-90k 12.7% 90-120k 20.7%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — Audi Rs
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 65 12.3%
30-60k 552 11.2%
60-90k 465 12.7%
90-120k 116 20.7%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 7 yrs 9.3% 8 yrs 16.1% 9 yrs 14.9% 10 yrs 12.0% 11 yrs 11.5%
How the Rs's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — Audi Rs
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 255 10.6%
2022 253 14.6%
2023 255 16.1%
2024 233 10.7%
2025 218 11.0%

What to check before buying a Audi Rs

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

What is the MOT pass rate for the Audi Rs?

87.3% of the 1,214 Audi Rs MOT tests in this dataset passed, a 12.7% fail rate, across model years 2008–2015.

What does the Audi Rs most often fail its MOT on?

Tyres, recorded in 5.5% of tests, then suspension (3.4%).

How much does mileage affect Rs MOT results?

Fail rates run at 12.3% for cars in the 0-30k band and 20.7% for 90-120k, a 8.4-point difference.

Methodology & source. Based on 1,214 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data