2016 Audi Q2 — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 3,719 MOT tests, the 2016 Audi Q2 recorded a 91.7% pass rate. Against small SUVs of a similar age (14.1% fail rate), the 2016 Q2 comes out 5.8pp better. Failures cluster in tyres, brakes and lighting & signalling.

92%
Pass rate
3,719
MOT tests analysed
8.3%
Fail rate
better than
vs small SUVs of similar age
7
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — tyres (4.0%) and brakes (2.7%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are brake discs, tread depth and brake pads — brake discs alone was recorded 76 times.

A 120-150k example is materially riskier than a 0-30k one: 8.8% versus 3.8%.

Fuel type barely separates them — petrol fails 8.2% of the time against 8.5% for diesel.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: tyres was flagged on 25.9% of tests without failing them.

The trend is worsening — 5.9% of tests failed in 2021 against 9.7% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2016 Q2 8.3% small SUVs avg 14.1% National avg 14.6%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2016 Audi Q2
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Tyres 4.0% 149
2 Brakes 2.7% 99
3 Lighting & signalling 2.0% 76
4 Visibility 0.8% 28
5 Suspension 0.6% 21
6 Emissions & environmental 0.5% 17
Share of tests failing on each category Tyres 4.0% Brakes 2.7% Lighting & signalling 2.0% Visibility 0.8% Suspension 0.6% Emissions & environmental 0.5%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2016 Audi Q2
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Brake discs76
2Tread depth75
3Brake pads52
4Headlamp aim49
5Washers23
6Service brake performance21

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2016 Audi Q2
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 25.9% 962
2 Brakes 25.2% 938
3 Other defects 6.9% 258
4 Suspension 4.3% 161
5 Visibility 3.4% 128
6 Lighting & signalling 0.4% 16

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 3.8% 30-60k 8.1% 60-90k 10.5% 90-120k 13.5% 120-150k 8.8%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2016 Q2
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 587 3.8%
30-60k 1,969 8.1%
60-90k 932 10.5%
90-120k 185 13.5%
120-150k 34 8.8%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 5 yrs 5.9% 6 yrs 6.6% 7 yrs 10.2% 8 yrs 9.0% 9 yrs 9.7%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

By fuel type

Fail rate by fuel type — 2016 Q2
Fuel Tests Fail rate
Petrol 2,382 8.2%
Diesel 1,337 8.5%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2016 Q2
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 730 5.9%
2022 727 6.6%
2023 768 10.2%
2024 754 9.0%
2025 740 9.7%

What to check before buying a 2016 Q2

On a 2016 Q2, tyres is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 4.0% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2016 Audi Q2s pass their MOT?

91.7% of the 3,719 2016 Audi Q2 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 8.3% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2016 Audi Q2?

Tyres, recorded in 4.0% of tests, followed by brakes (2.7%).

Does the 2016 Q2 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 3.8% in the 0-30k band to 8.8% in the 120-150k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 3,719 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data