2017 Aston Martin Vantage — MOT failures & pass rate

1,564 MOT tests on the 2017 Aston Martin Vantage are in this dataset, and 95.6% of them passed. Coupes & convertibles of a similar age fail 9.8% of the time, so this is 5.4pp better than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, tyres and visibility.

96%
Pass rate
1,564
MOT tests analysed
4.4%
Fail rate
better than
vs coupes & convertibles of similar age
5.9
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (2.2%) and tyres (1.7%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are headlamp aim, tyre pressure monitoring system and wipers — headlamp aim alone was recorded 42 times.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: tyres was flagged on 9.3% of tests without failing them.

The trend is worsening — 3.9% of tests failed in 2021 against 5.9% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2017 Vantage 4.4% coupes & convertibles avg 9.8% National avg 12.6%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2017 Aston Martin Vantage
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 2.2% 35
2 Tyres 1.7% 26
3 Visibility 1.0% 15
4 Emissions & environmental 1.0% 15
5 Brakes 0.4% 7
6 Other defects 0.4% 7
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 2.2% Tyres 1.7% Visibility 1.0% Emissions & environmental 1.0% Brakes 0.4% Other defects 0.4%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2017 Aston Martin Vantage
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Headlamp aim42
2Tyre pressure monitoring system11
3Wipers11
4Registration plates11
5Malfunction indicator lamp10
6Headlamp cleaning device7

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2017 Aston Martin Vantage
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 9.3% 146
2 Brakes 4.2% 66
3 Seat belts & restraints 2.4% 37
4 Other defects 1.7% 26
5 Emissions & environmental 1.1% 17
6 Visibility 0.6% 10

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 4.0% 30-60k 9.2%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2017 Vantage
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 1,458 4.0%
30-60k 98 9.2%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 4 yrs 3.9% 5 yrs 3.5% 6 yrs 4.1% 7 yrs 4.8% 8 yrs 5.9%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2017 Vantage
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 337 3.9%
2022 313 3.5%
2023 316 4.1%
2024 293 4.8%
2025 305 5.9%

What to check before buying a 2017 Vantage

On a 2017 Vantage, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 2.2% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2017 Aston Martin Vantages pass their MOT?

95.6% of the 1,564 2017 Aston Martin Vantage MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 4.4% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2017 Aston Martin Vantage?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 2.2% of tests, followed by tyres (1.7%).

Does the 2017 Vantage get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 4.0% in the 0-30k band to 9.2% in the 30-60k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 1,564 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data