2005 Aston Martin V8 Vantage — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2005 Aston Martin V8 Vantage passed 91.0% of its 365 recorded MOT tests. That is 13.2 percentage points better than coupes & convertibles of a similar age, which fail at 22.3%. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, visibility and suspension.

91%
Pass rate
365
MOT tests analysed
9.0%
Fail rate
better than
vs coupes & convertibles of similar age
18
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (4.7%) and visibility (2.7%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are headlamp aim, coil spring and malfunction indicator lamp — headlamp aim alone was recorded 8 times.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: brakes was flagged on 13.4% of tests without failing them.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 13.2% in 2021 to 6.6% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2005 V8 Vantage 9.0% coupes & convertibles avg 22.3% National avg 27.6%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2005 Aston Martin V8 Vantage
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 4.7% 17
2 Visibility 2.7% 10
3 Suspension 2.5% 9
4 Emissions & environmental 2.5% 9
5 Tyres 1.1% 4
6 Brakes 1.1% 4
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 4.7% Visibility 2.7% Suspension 2.5% Emissions & environmental 2.5% Tyres 1.1% Brakes 1.1%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2005 Aston Martin V8 Vantage
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Headlamp aim8
2Coil spring8
3Malfunction indicator lamp8
4Washers6
5Wipers6
6Position lamp5

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2005 Aston Martin V8 Vantage
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 13.4% 49
2 Tyres 13.4% 49
3 Seat belts & restraints 6.9% 25
4 Suspension 4.9% 18
5 Visibility 2.5% 9
6 Lighting & signalling 2.5% 9

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 7.3% 60-90k 7.2%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2005 V8 Vantage
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 165 7.3%
60-90k 139 7.2%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 16 yrs 13.2% 17 yrs 7.2% 18 yrs 9.3% 19 yrs 8.7% 20 yrs 6.6%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2005 V8 Vantage
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 76 13.2%
2022 69 7.2%
2023 75 9.3%
2024 69 8.7%
2025 76 6.6%

What to check before buying a 2005 V8 Vantage

On a 2005 V8 Vantage, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 4.7% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2005 Aston Martin V8 Vantages pass their MOT?

91.0% of the 365 2005 Aston Martin V8 Vantage MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 9.0% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2005 Aston Martin V8 Vantage?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 4.7% of tests, followed by visibility (2.7%).

Does the 2005 V8 Vantage get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 7.3% in the 30-60k band to 7.2% in the 60-90k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 365 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data