2002 Alfa Romeo Spider — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 746 MOT tests, the 2002 Alfa Romeo Spider recorded a 76.5% pass rate. Against all cars of a similar age (27.4% fail rate), the 2002 Spider comes out 4.0pp better. Failures cluster in brakes, body, structure & corrosion and suspension.

77%
Pass rate
746
MOT tests analysed
23.5%
Fail rate
in line with
vs cars of similar age
20.8
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: brakes, recorded in 11.4% of tests against 7.8% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are rbt (sp), wipers and joints — rbt (sp) alone was recorded 57 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 18.3% in the 30-60k band and 31.5% in the 120-150k band, a 13.3-point spread.

Suspension is the most common advisory, noted on 26.7% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 27.8% in 2021 to 16.8% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2002 Spider 23.5% cars avg 24.2% National avg 27.4%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2002 Alfa Romeo Spider
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Brakes 11.4% 85
2 Body, structure & corrosion 7.8% 58
3 Suspension 6.8% 51
4 Lighting & signalling 6.3% 47
5 Visibility 6.2% 46
6 Emissions & environmental 4.3% 32
Share of tests failing on each category Brakes 11.4% Body, structure & corrosion 7.8% Suspension 6.8% Lighting & signalling 6.3% Visibility 6.2% Emissions & environmental 4.3%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2002 Alfa Romeo Spider
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Rbt (sp)57
2Wipers36
3Joints36
4Exhaust system30
5Washers23
6Headlamp aim23

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2002 Alfa Romeo Spider
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 26.7% 199
2 Brakes 25.5% 190
3 Tyres 20.1% 150
4 Emissions & environmental 13.7% 102
5 Body, structure & corrosion 12.7% 95
6 Lighting & signalling 5.2% 39

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 18.3% 60-90k 22.3% 90-120k 24.2% 120-150k 31.5%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2002 Spider
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 126 18.3%
60-90k 296 22.3%
90-120k 198 24.2%
120-150k 73 31.5%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 19 yrs 27.8% 20 yrs 23.2% 21 yrs 26.3% 22 yrs 20.5% 23 yrs 16.8%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2002 Spider
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 187 27.8%
2022 155 23.2%
2023 152 26.3%
2024 127 20.5%
2025 125 16.8%

What to check before buying a 2002 Spider

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: brakes accounted for 11.4% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2002 Alfa Romeo Spiders pass their MOT?

76.5% of the 746 2002 Alfa Romeo Spider MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 23.5% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2002 Alfa Romeo Spider?

Brakes, recorded in 11.4% of tests, followed by body, structure & corrosion (7.8%).

Does the 2002 Spider get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 18.3% in the 30-60k band to 31.5% in the 120-150k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 746 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data