2018 Alfa Romeo Mito — MOT failures & pass rate

2,383 MOT tests on the 2018 Alfa Romeo Mito are in this dataset, and 84.8% of them passed. Superminis of a similar age fail 11.3% of the time, so this is 3.9pp worse than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in suspension, visibility and tyres.

85%
Pass rate
2,383
MOT tests analysed
15.2%
Fail rate
worse than
vs superminis of similar age
5
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Suspension dominates the failure mix at 7.9% of all tests — 3.6 points clear of visibility, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are coil spring, wipers and brake pads — coil spring alone was recorded 186 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 12.5% in the 0-30k band and 22.4% in the 60-90k band, a 9.9-point spread.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: tyres was flagged on 23.1% of tests without failing them.

The trend is worsening — 7.6% of tests failed in 2021 against 18.5% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2018 Mito 15.2% superminis avg 11.3% National avg 11.1%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2018 Alfa Romeo Mito
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Suspension 7.9% 188
2 Visibility 4.3% 103
3 Tyres 3.9% 94
4 Brakes 3.4% 81
5 Lighting & signalling 2.9% 70
6 Emissions & environmental 0.7% 17
Share of tests failing on each category Suspension 7.9% Visibility 4.3% Tyres 3.9% Brakes 3.4% Lighting & signalling 2.9% Emissions & environmental 0.7%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2018 Alfa Romeo Mito
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Coil spring186
2Wipers80
3Brake pads52
4Tread depth48
5Washers45
6Headlamp aim39

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2018 Alfa Romeo Mito
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 23.1% 550
2 Brakes 20.9% 499
3 Suspension 5.3% 127
4 Other defects 4.7% 113
5 Visibility 2.3% 55
6 Lighting & signalling 2.2% 53

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 12.5% 30-60k 18.5% 60-90k 22.4%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2018 Mito
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 1,387 12.5%
30-60k 861 18.5%
60-90k 125 22.4%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 3 yrs 7.6% 4 yrs 11.2% 5 yrs 18.8% 6 yrs 18.8% 7 yrs 18.5%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

By fuel type

Fail rate by fuel type — 2018 Mito
Fuel Tests Fail rate
Petrol 2,157 15.2%
Diesel 226 15.0%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2018 Mito
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 445 7.6%
2022 463 11.2%
2023 494 18.8%
2024 495 18.8%
2025 486 18.5%

What to check before buying a 2018 Mito

On a 2018 Mito, suspension is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 7.9% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2018 Alfa Romeo Mitos pass their MOT?

84.8% of the 2,383 2018 Alfa Romeo Mito MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 15.2% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2018 Alfa Romeo Mito?

Suspension, recorded in 7.9% of tests, followed by visibility (4.3%).

Does the 2018 Mito get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 12.5% in the 0-30k band to 22.4% in the 60-90k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 2,383 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data