2010 Abarth Punto — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2010 Abarth Punto passed 77.6% of its 433 recorded MOT tests. Against all cars of a similar age (24.2% fail rate), the 2010 Punto comes out 1.8pp better. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and brakes.

78%
Pass rate
433
MOT tests analysed
22.4%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
12.8
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Lighting & signalling dominates the failure mix at 14.8% of all tests — 6.7 points clear of suspension, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are headlamp aim, catalyst emissions and position lamp — headlamp aim alone was recorded 50 times.

Mileage matters less than usual here: the 2010 Punto fails 20.0% of the time in the 30-60k band and 17.1% at 120-150k, a spread of only 2.9 points.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: brakes was flagged on 26.8% of tests without failing them.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 27.3% in 2021 to 20.0% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2010 Punto 22.4% cars avg 20.6% National avg 24.2%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2010 Abarth Punto
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 14.8% 64
2 Suspension 8.1% 35
3 Brakes 7.6% 33
4 Emissions & environmental 4.9% 21
5 Tyres 4.4% 19
6 Visibility 3.5% 15
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 14.8% Suspension 8.1% Brakes 7.6% Emissions & environmental 4.9% Tyres 4.4% Visibility 3.5%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2010 Abarth Punto
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Headlamp aim50
2Catalyst emissions16
3Position lamp16
4Headlamp16
5Coil spring13
6Tread depth12

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2010 Abarth Punto
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 26.8% 116
2 Tyres 24.9% 108
3 Suspension 24.0% 104
4 Lighting & signalling 14.8% 64
5 Body, structure & corrosion 8.1% 35
6 Emissions & environmental 4.9% 21

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 20.0% 60-90k 24.0% 90-120k 21.3% 120-150k 17.1%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2010 Punto
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 60 20.0%
60-90k 171 24.0%
90-120k 141 21.3%
120-150k 35 17.1%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 11 yrs 27.3% 12 yrs 25.5% 13 yrs 18.5% 14 yrs 18.4% 15 yrs 20.0%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2010 Punto
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 99 27.3%
2022 102 25.5%
2023 81 18.5%
2024 76 18.4%
2025 75 20.0%

What to check before buying a 2010 Punto

On a 2010 Punto, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 14.8% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2010 Abarth Puntos pass their MOT?

77.6% of the 433 2010 Abarth Punto MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 22.4% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2010 Abarth Punto?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 14.8% of tests, followed by suspension (8.1%).

Does the 2010 Punto get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 20.0% in the 30-60k band to 17.1% in the 120-150k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 433 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data